Reasoning around moving to CCI and our subset of it
This article explains our choice of Canadian Classification of Interventions (CCI) as a procedure coding schema and of the subset of codes we include.
Why are we moving to a new procedure coding schema?
- Our old diagnosis list was made in-house designed mostly for the Critical Care setting where our database started out. In that data set we combined diagnoses and procedures.
- A serious limitation of the current/old system is that it did not distinguish procedures from diagnoses. For example, CABG was considered as a diagnosis, when it's actually a procedure done for a diagnosis of Coronary artery disease, chronic (atherosclerosis, chronic ischemic heart disease).
Why are we moving to CCI rather than a different coding schema?
Why do we not include the entire set of CCI codes
- We have made a number of adaptations so we don't need to use all 18,000 codes.
- Small and common procedures can be so frequent that collecting all would have significantly increased collection efforts.
- It's OK to exclude these because if something important comes of them, it will be reflected in the ICD10 collection.
- For a listing of procedures that we have consciously chosen not to code, see CCI procedures we don't code.
Why are we including the subset of procedures that we do
Template:Discussion Why?
Related Articles
| Related articles: |