Renal Coding Considerations (old)
These checks are currently done partly by Pagasa ([[1]]) and are about to be implemented in CCMDB.mdb.
Data Integrity Rules that can be checked before sending
These rules are currently checked at the main office and result in calls for clarification from Pagasa if broken. Some of them have been added to CCMDB.mdb, more are to follow.
Competing Diagnoses
If comorbid CRF (351-00) exists then the following must not appear in Admit/Acquired codes
- ARI (364-00)
- ATN (352-00)
- ARF (Diagnosis) (350 **)
Implementation
Implementing ARF vs CRF as per Check Renal IncomaptibleDxs.
Discussion
Template:Discussion The check does not include ATN yet since the guideline for that diagnosis doesn't instruct not to code with CRF, and the concept ATN does not seem to preclude CRF. Could someone explain why ATN can not coincide with CRF? Ttenbergen 11:08, 30 September 2009 (CDT)
Diagnoses, Comos vs. Tasks, locations
Discussion
Apache vs. CRF comorbid
- see Check ApARF CRF.
Apache vs. ARF Dx
cross-checks impossible due to different definitions, see ARF (Diagnosis) and ARF (APACHE)
Data Integrity Rules that can not be checked before sending
ARF and ICU TISS
- TISS 53 to 55: Don't forget to cross check the TISS form with the diagnosis and visa versa.
ARF & TISS integrity checks
- have TISS 53, 54, 55 but no Renal failure DX (350, 351, 352, 355, 356, 398, 450-499, 327, 357)
- from community hosp to teaching hosp with DX of 350 AND no dialysis on TISS at community hosp AND DX of 350 AND TISS 53, 54 or 55 marked at teaching hospital, then the DX of ARF for community hospital is correct.
Related Articles
see Category:Renal Problem for other renal problems