1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2024-08-04 12:28:34 PM |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | ICD10 Diagnosis • Iatrogenic • Iatrogenic infection • Infection requiring pathogen • Infectious disease • Pneumonia • Questions • Respiratory • VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia |
| _pageID | Integer | 6,282 |
| _pageName | Page | Pneumonia, ventilator-associated (VAP) |
| _pageTitle | String | Pneumonia, ventilator-associated (VAP)
|
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| who | Text | Task |
| question | Wikitext | Does this rule still apply since we no longer require an organism for a VAP, if someone is admitted with a CAP and later meets the criteria with the same bug, with our new guidelines would this not be considered a VAP? Lisa Kaita 11:16, 2024 July 24 (CDT)
- This will be carried over to next TASK (Sept12, 2024) Lisa Kaita 12:21, 2024 August 1 (CDT)
|
6 rows are stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Category | Page | Category:Infectious disease |
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Category | Page | Category:Respiratory |
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Category | Page | Category:Pneumonia |
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Category | Page | Category:Iatrogenic |
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| Category | Page | Category:Iatrogenic infection |
1 row is stored for this page
| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|
| StartDate | Date | 2019-01-01 |
| StopDate | Date | 2999-12-31 |
| ICD10_Code | String | J95.88 |