Pyelonephritis (Kidney Infection/Abcess): Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
*Question is never dumb.   
*Question is never dumb.   
*First thing, please '''get rid of you old code book,''' you should have an updated one. These code were migrated to the infection section June 26.06.  I am not sure why you are still using old code book?
*First thing, please '''get rid of you old code book,''' you should have an updated one. These code were migrated to the infection section June 26.06.  I am not sure why you are still using old code book?
*Urosepsis is a term used imprecisely to denote infection ranging from urinary tract infection to generalized sepsis which may result from such infection.
*[[Urosepsis]] is a term used imprecisely to denote infection ranging from urinary tract infection to generalized sepsis which may result from such infection.
* for our purpose the definition of urosepsis is: bacteremia/Septecemia resulting from urinary tract infection.
* for our purpose the definition of [[Urosepsis]] is: septicemia/bacteremia resulting from urinary tract infection.


*If localized bladder infection (cystitis) only code 51 - subcode with applicable pathogen
*If localized bladder infection (cystitis) only code 51 - subcode with applicable pathogen


*if the DX is urosepsis - which mean it is know or suspected that the infection has gone into bloodstream, then '''also code with''' [[septicimia/bacteremia]] (46) with subcode that is applicable. [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 14:11, 8 January 2009 (CST)
*if the DX is [[Urosepsis]] - which mean it is know or suspected that the infection has gone into bloodstream, then '''also code with''' [[septicemia/bacteremia]] (46) with subcode that is applicable. [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 14:11, 8 January 2009 (CST)


*Yes it seems that Doc's use the DX of urosepsis when referring the localized bladder infection.  
*Yes it seems that Doc's use the DX of urosepsis when referring the localized bladder infection.  
   
   
 
{{stub}}
[[Category:Diagnosis Coding]]
[[Category:Diagnosis Coding]]

Revision as of 15:51, 8 January 2009

Definition

Infection and/or abcess in the KIDNEY


Legacy Content

This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:

Click Expand to show legacy content.



Legacy Content

This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:

Click Expand to show legacy content.



Template:Discussion

Discussion

  • I have a dumb question in our old books code 359 kidney infections/abcesses (ei.pyelonephritis/urosepsis) and code 360 was just for cystitis (bladder infection) in our new book code 51 says only Cystitis (bladder infection) does not say Urosepsis
  • definition: Can be used interchangeably to describe either
  • (A)urinary tract infection(UTI) or
  • (B) the rare occurrence of bacterial seeding into the blood stream due to an UTI causing a generalised infection.
  • So my question is we now include urosepsis to code 51? Is this a correct understanding of the use of code 51? (SKiesman, Jan 8 2009 10:54am)
  • Question is never dumb.
  • First thing, please get rid of you old code book, you should have an updated one. These code were migrated to the infection section June 26.06. I am not sure why you are still using old code book?
  • Urosepsis is a term used imprecisely to denote infection ranging from urinary tract infection to generalized sepsis which may result from such infection.
  • for our purpose the definition of Urosepsis is: septicemia/bacteremia resulting from urinary tract infection.
  • If localized bladder infection (cystitis) only code 51 - subcode with applicable pathogen
  • if the DX is Urosepsis - which mean it is know or suspected that the infection has gone into bloodstream, then also code with septicemia/bacteremia (46) with subcode that is applicable. TOstryzniuk 14:11, 8 January 2009 (CST)
  • Yes it seems that Doc's use the DX of urosepsis when referring the localized bladder infection.

Template:Stub