Hypovolemic/Hemorrhagic Shock: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SKiesman (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m Text replacement - "{{DX tag | Cardiovascular" to "{{DX tag | Cardiovascular Problems"
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DX tag | Cardiovascular | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |  
{{PreICD10 dx | NewDxArticle = Shock, hypovolemic shock or hemorrhagic shock}}
{{DX tag | Cardiovascular Problems | Medical Problem | HYPOVOLEMIC/HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK |  
* 1 Epistaxis
* 1 Epistaxis
* 2 Gastrointestinal Bleed
* 2 Gastrointestinal Bleed
Line 5: Line 6:
* 4 Intraperitoneal Bleed
* 4 Intraperitoneal Bleed
* 5 Post-op Bleed
* 5 Post-op Bleed
* 6 AAA Rupture (see 127 also)
* 6 AAA Rupture (see [[Aneurysm]] also)
* 7 Gynecological Bleeding
* 7 Gynecological Bleeding
* 90 Other  | 136-00 | No | 0 | '''Critical Care and Medicine'''| Currently Collected ||  |}}
* 90 Other  | 136-00 | No | 0 | '''Critical Care and Medicine'''| Currently Collected ||  |}}


'''RE:136-90'''
== use of subdiagnosis "other" (136-90)==
{{Discussion}}
The use of this sub-diagnosis was discussed at the Task meeting December 5,2012.It was decided that even though this category is used for bleeding problems, we will also use 136-90 for severe shock related to non hemorrhagic hypovolemia.Thanks again to everyone who participated in answering the question I had previously posted on wiki.[[User:GHall|GHall]] 17:17, 2012 December 5 (EST)
*what have collectors been doing in past for shock due to dehyration?  This category was only meant to be for hypovolemia due to bleeding for different reasons as listed.  139-90 other, is other bleeding causing hypovolemia.  I have asked Dr. Garland for further opinion on this.  I am not sure the task group really wants to  "mix" shock due to dehydration from not drinking or burns with shock due to hyovolemia from bleeds.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 16:39, 2012 October 19 (CDT)
** at the meeting we also talked about dehydration from burns. If we don't code it here, then how should it be coded? I think that was what brought the question forward in the first place... Ttenbergen 17:23, 2012 October 19 (CDT)
*This code is used inconsistently by collectors. What do you want us to use for severely dehydrated patients who are in severe shock? Hypotension NYD?? or what?? If this category is only for bleeding then we need to clearly state that[[User:GHall|GHall]] 07:22, 2012 October 22 (CDT)
*Hypovolemic shock should be for any reason and the subcode could indicate "other" if not on the list.  This is my opinion. When it is a bleed then there is usually another code to indicate this anyway.  I think it should not have the words "hemorrhagic shock" as part of the title as this is misleading and most collectors will only collect bleeding-related hypovolemic shock.  I am sure we have missed the hypovolemic shocks that are for other reasons because of that title. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 11:46, 2012 October 22 (CDT)  
*** I know I have been using this code when a pt is severely dehydrated and has signs and symptoms of hypovolemic shock so I code other 136-90
 
[[Category: Shock]]

Latest revision as of 23:20, 30 December 2018


Legacy Content

This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:Shock, hypovolemic shock or hemorrhagic shock

Click Expand to show legacy content.

use of subdiagnosis "other" (136-90)

The use of this sub-diagnosis was discussed at the Task meeting December 5,2012.It was decided that even though this category is used for bleeding problems, we will also use 136-90 for severe shock related to non hemorrhagic hypovolemia.Thanks again to everyone who participated in answering the question I had previously posted on wiki.GHall 17:17, 2012 December 5 (EST)