Var 2 - Discharge-to Ward: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →MAP: inclusion of old "MAP" article |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
OBS tag for CON patient in ER telemetry used to be stored here. The 4 patients that have been tagged in Variable slot 2 with OBS have had this code moved to ICU var 1 in master database. | OBS tag for CON patient in ER telemetry used to be stored here. The 4 patients that have been tagged in Variable slot 2 with OBS have had this code moved to ICU var 1 in master database. | ||
=== MAP === | === MAP === | ||
* [[ | * "MAP" would have been entered into Var 2 for those ICU patients with an [[myocardial infarction]] (MI) who have been put on the '''MI Care Map''' | ||
** started November 2004 | ** started November 2004 | ||
** ended 2010-Oct-29 | ** ended 2010-Oct-29 | ||
* when this was used if both BRR and MAP were used coding BRR took precedence over MAP. | * when this was used if both BRR and MAP were used coding BRR took precedence over MAP. | ||
==== Lead-up to this becoming legacy ==== | |||
* CCU MAP in this variable is likely unnecessary as all patient who have an acute MI are automatically put on the acute MI care map.--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 11:34, 18 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
**in 2004/05 when MI care MAP was first introduced, Betty Lou Rock wanted to track if it was being applied at all sites consistently. It has been discussed that at some sites, the MI care map is not applied consistently. Need to follow this up with the Database Steering Committee and see if they would like us to stop tagging MAP and relegate the code to the legacy category. | |||
***Email sent to Rock, Light and Roberts today.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 15:40, 22 July 2008 (CDT). | |||
****No reply to date.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:09, 29 December 2008 (CST) | |||
[[Category: ICU Variable Codes]] | [[Category: ICU Variable Codes]] | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 29 October 2010
ICU Var 2 currently the following options:
- BRR - tag used for Cardiac Arrest Cooling Protocol. Click HERE for more information.
- Started June 2004. Consistent application of code didn't start at all sites until about Aug 2004?
- XBR
Can the MAP be eliminated
- Another thing that I believe could be eliminated is acute care map in variable 2. Betty Lou had mentioned in a meeting a few years ago that this was no longer necessary. All patient who have acute MI are on the care map. This is just an unnecessary piece of data to add. --LKolesar 14:52, 27 October 2010 (CDT)--
- Trish/Julie, can this be a "go"? If so, please update in Requested_CCMDB_changes_for_the_next_version#Remove care map Var 2, update this article and remove this discussion. Ttenbergen 14:13, 28 October 2010 (CDT)
- yes turf--TOstryzniuk 19:37, 28 October 2010 (CDT)
- Trish/Julie, can this be a "go"? If so, please update in Requested_CCMDB_changes_for_the_next_version#Remove care map Var 2, update this article and remove this discussion. Ttenbergen 14:13, 28 October 2010 (CDT)
Legacy Data
OBS
OBS tag for CON patient in ER telemetry used to be stored here. The 4 patients that have been tagged in Variable slot 2 with OBS have had this code moved to ICU var 1 in master database.
MAP
- "MAP" would have been entered into Var 2 for those ICU patients with an myocardial infarction (MI) who have been put on the MI Care Map
- started November 2004
- ended 2010-Oct-29
- when this was used if both BRR and MAP were used coding BRR took precedence over MAP.
Lead-up to this becoming legacy
- CCU MAP in this variable is likely unnecessary as all patient who have an acute MI are automatically put on the acute MI care map.--LKolesar 11:34, 18 June 2008 (CDT)
- in 2004/05 when MI care MAP was first introduced, Betty Lou Rock wanted to track if it was being applied at all sites consistently. It has been discussed that at some sites, the MI care map is not applied consistently. Need to follow this up with the Database Steering Committee and see if they would like us to stop tagging MAP and relegate the code to the legacy category.
- Email sent to Rock, Light and Roberts today.TOstryzniuk 15:40, 22 July 2008 (CDT).
- No reply to date.TOstryzniuk 16:09, 29 December 2008 (CST)
- Email sent to Rock, Light and Roberts today.TOstryzniuk 15:40, 22 July 2008 (CDT).
- in 2004/05 when MI care MAP was first introduced, Betty Lou Rock wanted to track if it was being applied at all sites consistently. It has been discussed that at some sites, the MI care map is not applied consistently. Need to follow this up with the Database Steering Committee and see if they would like us to stop tagging MAP and relegate the code to the legacy category.