Query NDC TISS CCI endoscopic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m m |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Cross-checking of complication dx of [[Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy]] (779) vs [[TISS28]] item 43 | Cross-checking of complication dx of [[Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy]] (779) vs [[TISS28]] item 43 [[Endoscopy (TISS Item)|Endoscopy (any type of scope) in the ICU]]. | ||
== TISS28 entry 43 without Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx == | == TISS28 entry 43 without Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx without TISS28 entry 43 == | == Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx without TISS28 entry 43 == | ||
Is there a scenario where this would be allowed? "I just looked up Laryngoscopy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laryngoscopy]. It doesn't seem to require any endoscopy." That would mean if a laryngoscopy was done, a fill endoscopy might not have been. If this were possible, this check would give false-positives. If not possible then this half of the test could be implemented. {{Potential Change}}{{Discussion}} | Is there a scenario where this would be allowed? "I just looked up Laryngoscopy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laryngoscopy]. It doesn't seem to require any endoscopy." That would mean if a laryngoscopy was done, a fill endoscopy might not have been. If this were possible, this check would give false-positives. If not possible then this half of the test could be implemented. {{Potential Change}}{{Discussion}} | ||
{{CCI|needs review}}{{ICD10|needs review}} | |||
Will we want this cross-check in ICD10/CCI? If so what will be the details? Ttenbergen 00:15, 2017 December 12 (CST) | |||
[[Category: TISS28 Checks]] | [[Category: TISS28 Checks]] | ||
Revision as of 01:15, 12 December 2017
Cross-checking of complication dx of Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy (779) vs TISS28 item 43 Endoscopy (any type of scope) in the ICU.
TISS28 entry 43 without Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx
TISS28 refers to any scope, so dx 779 is not required at the same time. and dx797.
Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx without TISS28 entry 43
Is there a scenario where this would be allowed? "I just looked up Laryngoscopy [1]. It doesn't seem to require any endoscopy." That would mean if a laryngoscopy was done, a fill endoscopy might not have been. If this were possible, this check would give false-positives. If not possible then this half of the test could be implemented. Template:Potential ChangeTemplate:Discussion
Template:CCITemplate:ICD10 Will we want this cross-check in ICD10/CCI? If so what will be the details? Ttenbergen 00:15, 2017 December 12 (CST)