Quality Assurance queries in CFE: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) where fits? |
minor |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== QA checks == | == QA checks == | ||
#[[Query NDC missing Ls | NDC_missing_Ls]]? | |||
# NDC_discharged_incomplete | # NDC_discharged_incomplete | ||
# NDC_Bad_Postal_Code | # NDC_Bad_Postal_Code | ||
# NDC_Missing_TransferDate_w_pivot | # NDC_Missing_TransferDate_w_pivot | ||
# NDC_CLI_AcqDX_but_NoCLI_DateinTMPV2 | # NDC_CLI_AcqDX_but_NoCLI_DateinTMPV2 | ||
# NDC_CLI_No_AcqDX_but_CLI_DateinTMPV2 | # NDC_CLI_No_AcqDX_but_CLI_DateinTMPV2 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Data Processing]] | [[Category:Data Processing]] | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 22 January 2016
We have a bunch of Quality Assurance questions in CFE. Most of them currently have a backlog or errors. As the backlog gets eliminated we can add them to Centralized data Vetting Process.
QA checks
- NDC_missing_Ls?
- NDC_discharged_incomplete
- NDC_Bad_Postal_Code
- NDC_Missing_TransferDate_w_pivot
- NDC_CLI_AcqDX_but_NoCLI_DateinTMPV2
- NDC_CLI_No_AcqDX_but_CLI_DateinTMPV2
- NDC_CLI_unacceptable_date
- NDC_VAP_AcqDX_but_NoVAP_DateinTMPV2 (see VAP Dx vs Tmp checking)
- NDC_VAP_No_AcqDX_but_VAP_DateinTMPV2 (see VAP Dx vs Tmp checking)
- NDC_VAP_unacceptable_date (see VAP Dx vs Tmp checking)