BRR: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
Line 33: Line 33:
[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:19, 22 July 2008 (CDT)
[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:19, 22 July 2008 (CDT)


===Data Integrity Rules===  
===Data Integrity Rules===
:(March 18.09: have not been applied yet - waiting for Tina to apply to ccmdb.mdb)
*If 100-2 on ADMIT or COMPLICATION DX slot then the following '''must''' also be marked:
FOR: ICU_Var2:
**[[ICU_Var 2 | ICU Var 2]] – “BRR” or “XBR”
*If ANY admit or complication DX on an ICU patient is '''100-2'''
**then [[ICU Var 2 | Var 2]]: '''MUST''' have either [[BRR]] or '''XBR''' (new code)
***'''BRR''' - mean cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
***'''BRR''' - mean cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
***'''XBR''' - means no cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
***'''XBR''' - means no cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
::AND
**TISS item 6 (T6) - hypo/hyperthermia blanket


:By marking BRR or BRX for all with DX of 100-2, collectors will have verified at the time of collection that they did not miss marking Var 2, and this will reduce the query's that gets send back for double checking.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 21:46, 18 March 2009 (CDT)
:By marking BRR or BRX for all with DX of 100-2, collectors will have verified at the time of collection that they did not miss marking Var 2, and this will reduce the query's that gets send back for double checking.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 21:46, 18 March 2009 (CDT)


*the above is a SUGGESTION for updated version of CCMDB: look here:[[CCMDB.mdb_Change_Log_2009#ICU_Var2:_BRR_.26_Complication_DX_code_of_Cardiac_Arrest |Suggestion for Catching missed BRR in ACCESS]].--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:03, 28 January 2009 (CST).   
*the above is a SUGGESTION for updated version of CCMDB: look here:[[CCMDB.mdb_Change_Log_2009#ICU_Var2:_BRR_.26_Complication_DX_code_of_Cardiac_Arrest |Suggestion for Catching missed BRR in ACCESS]].--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:03, 28 January 2009 (CST).   
*tina, I am not sure were this rule disappeared from the change log or the large data integrity checker work list.  I found it in history and put the rule here.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 16:22, 18 March 2009 (CDT)
 




[[Category: ICU Variable Codes]]
[[Category: ICU Variable Codes]]
[[Category: Data Integrity Rules]]
[[Category: Data Integrity Rules]]

Revision as of 15:23, 19 March 2009

BRR is a ICU Var 2 tag that we use in our database for ICU patients who have been placed on the Cardiac Arrest Cooling Protocol

  • BRR - stands for "Brrrr" as in shivering or cold.



Cardiac Arrest Cooling Protocol

  • Target temp: 32°C to 34°C for 12 to 24 hours.
  • Code is not to be applied when a cooling protocol is used to normalize temperature for non-arrested patients.

Taken from the Hypothermia Protocol:

  • Cooling is indicated if ALL of the following are checked:
    • Witnessed Arrest (Dx code: 100-2)
    • Initial rhythm ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia(Dx code: 131-4, or 131-1)
    • Time to ACLS <15 minutes
    • Total ACLS time <60 minutes
    • Persistent GCS < or = 9
    • Systolic BP currently over 90 mmHg (pressors allowed)
    • < 8 hours elapsed since Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

--LKolesar 13:54, 22 January 2009 (CST) --TOstryzniuk 20:37, 26 January 2009 (CST)


Possible Value:

BRR if the protocol was applied
BRX if protocol NOT applied

TOstryzniuk 16:19, 22 July 2008 (CDT)

Data Integrity Rules

  • If 100-2 on ADMIT or COMPLICATION DX slot then the following must also be marked:
    • ICU Var 2 – “BRR” or “XBR”
      • BRR - mean cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
      • XBR - means no cooling protocol applied for cardiac arrest
AND
    • TISS item 6 (T6) - hypo/hyperthermia blanket


By marking BRR or BRX for all with DX of 100-2, collectors will have verified at the time of collection that they did not miss marking Var 2, and this will reduce the query's that gets send back for double checking.--TOstryzniuk 21:46, 18 March 2009 (CDT)