Team Meeting December 2, 2009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category: Data Collection Team Meetings]] | [[Category: Data Collection Team Meetings]] | ||
[[discussion]] | |||
**If we are adding peer reviewed audits into our workload, I would like to know what part of our workload is being taken away? We already have increased workload with septic shock and other tmp studies. I suggest that some of the lab counts be removed as already agreed with the steering committee. Any reduction would be welcome. I would like this discussed at the meeting and wondering what the delay is for reduction?? --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 18:44, 8 November 2009 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:44, 8 November 2009
- DATE: Wednesday, December 2, 2009
- TIME: 1300-1500 hours
- Place: HSC-John Buhler Research Center Conference Room - JB700
- See second map on HSC site Map.
Agenda:
- Peer to Peer audit
- Guest speaker-TBA
Template:Discussion
What items would collectors liked at this meet?--TOstryzniuk 22:57, 3 November 2009 (CST)
- Do we need another session about something wiki specific? People still tell me that they don't have the time to look at the recent changes. If it's done right, it should only take 5 minutes most days (OK, some days Trish and I get a bit edit-happy, on those days it might be 8 minutes)... Ttenbergen 18:12, 4 November 2009 (CST)
- If we are adding peer reviewed audits into our workload, I would like to know what part of our workload is being taken away? We already have increased workload with septic shock and other tmp studies. I suggest that some of the lab counts be removed as already agreed with the steering committee. Any reduction would be welcome. I would like this discussed at the meeting and wondering what the delay is for reduction?? --LKolesar 18:44, 8 November 2009 (CST)