CVA 2nd to OTHER: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
CVA-2nd to '''OTHER''' | This should be: CVA-2nd to '''OTHER''' medical procedures. | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 3 February 2010
This should be: CVA-2nd to OTHER medical procedures.
Notes
- 505 with no subcode or using subcode “90” really means the same thing in the big picture. The cause or type of stroke is not specified. Using subcode 90 does not give the stroke anymore meaning then leaving the subcode blank.
- Our “subcode” list for 505 is very small and for now we will keep it like that otherwise we can create subcode lists a miles long. We have to cut the level of detail somewhere because it can be endless.
- We are looking at moving new coding system and when we migrate this will be changed.
- I see that 505-90 had two different labels in the past. “other” and “2nd to other procedures”. We will keep it as just “other”.
Discussion
- Gail and Frans's discussion is in relation to where to code a person who had CVA aborted by TPA. Good suggestion.
- we have a code 763-02 for strokes that got TPA, though this does not tell you if CVA was aborted or not. I don't want to add new codes at this time since we are attempting to map our codes to ICU10.--TOstryzniuk 15:53, 15 January 2010 (CST)