Query NDC TISS CCI endoscopic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Ttenbergen moved page Check Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy vs TISS92/94 to Check Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy vs TISS28/43 without leaving a redirect: tiss28 |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 16:49, 8 April 2015
Cross-checking of complication dx of Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy (779) vs TISS28 item 43 "Endoscopy (any type of scope) in the ICU".
TISS28 entry 43 without Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx
TISS28 refers to any scope, so dx 779 is not required at the same time.
Bronchoscopy/Laryngoscopy dx without TISS28 entry 43
Is there a scenario where this would be allowed? "I just looked up Laryngoscopy [1]. It doesn't seem to require any endoscopy." That would mean if a laryngoscopy was done, a fill endoscopy might not have been. If this were possible, this check would give false-positives. If not possible then this half of the test could be implemented. Template:Potential ChangeTemplate:Discussion