ECMO: Difference between revisions

TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
m take to task meet - seems we can do this
m Task meeting had decided that if collectable this should just be implemented, no need to take back to meeting. Is there something I am missing?
Line 8: Line 8:
We discussed this at the task meeting today. Determined that it would be easy to implement input and storage for the data (use a new code for both and retire the old one). Need to confirm following before implementation:
We discussed this at the task meeting today. Determined that it would be easy to implement input and storage for the data (use a new code for both and retire the old one). Need to confirm following before implementation:


{{discussion}}
* Laura: would this be collectable? IE. is the information to make the determination whethcer ECMO was VV or VA always straightforward from the record, even without being able to ask for confirmation? If so, we will implement. Ttenbergen 14:15, 2015 July 9 (CDT)
* Laura: would this be collectable? IE. is the information to make the determination whethcer ECMO was VV or VA always straightforward from the record, even without being able to ask for confirmation? If so, we will implement. Ttenbergen 14:15, 2015 July 9 (CDT)
**ICMS at STB only keeps VV ecmo patients.  If a patient has AV ecmo inserted then they are readily transported to the Cardiac ICU.  I would be able to differentiate these. It is collectable, how do you want us to document this?--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:59, 2015 July 20 (CDT)
**ICMS at STB only keeps VV ecmo patients.  If a patient has AV ecmo inserted then they are readily transported to the Cardiac ICU.  I would be able to differentiate these. It is collectable, how do you want us to document this?--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:59, 2015 July 20 (CDT)
Line 14: Line 13:
**** 76342 - ECMO VV
**** 76342 - ECMO VV
**** 76343 - ECMO VA    Ttenbergen 15:33, 2015 July 20 (CDT)
**** 76343 - ECMO VA    Ttenbergen 15:33, 2015 July 20 (CDT)
 
***** Task meeting had decided that if collectable this should just be implemented, no need to take back to meeting. Is there something I am missing? Ttenbergen 12:27, 2015 July 22 (CDT) {{discussion}}
{{discuss@task}}




[[Category:Other CV Procedures]]
[[Category:Other CV Procedures]]
[[Category: Take to Task Meeting