Myocardial infarction: Difference between revisions

LKolesar (talk | contribs)
Llemoine (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
*I have seen quite a few type 2 MI's and our database really does not deal with this.  A type 2 MI is when there is no evidence of coronary artery disease, but the MI still occurs for other reasons.  It occurs when there is  supply/demand mismatch with no CAD.  The most common one we see is related to prolonged anemia where the pt's oxygen-carrying capacity is reduced.  Another reason would be reduced blood volume (hypovolemia), profound bradycardia, etc.  These conditions can cause an MI even with normal coronary arteries.   
*I have seen quite a few type 2 MI's and our database really does not deal with this.  A type 2 MI is when there is no evidence of coronary artery disease, but the MI still occurs for other reasons.  It occurs when there is  supply/demand mismatch with no CAD.  The most common one we see is related to prolonged anemia where the pt's oxygen-carrying capacity is reduced.  Another reason would be reduced blood volume (hypovolemia), profound bradycardia, etc.  These conditions can cause an MI even with normal coronary arteries.   
* I propose that if there is a supply/demand mismatch with normal coronaries and there is an elevated troponin, we call in a non Q MI (NSTEMI)unless there is a clear diagnosis of a STEMI or other reason for an increased troponin.  The other option is to make a new category for type 2 MI.--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 14:38, 2015 November 16 (CST)
* I propose that if there is a supply/demand mismatch with normal coronaries and there is an elevated troponin, we call in a non Q MI (NSTEMI)unless there is a clear diagnosis of a STEMI or other reason for an increased troponin.  The other option is to make a new category for type 2 MI.--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 14:38, 2015 November 16 (CST)
* I don't think this is new...we recognize this in the ACS population...if angio isn't done coronary arteries/status would not be known but we still code as NSTEMI(reviewing the EKGs and cardiology consult notes) and have been for awhile.--[[User:Llemoine|Llemoine]] 14:47, 2015 November 16 (CST)


== Discussion - elimination of subcodes ==
== Discussion - elimination of subcodes ==