ESBL or MRO: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
m m
m m
Line 1: Line 1:
Feb, 8.16 - Change in hospital procedure:[http://www.wrha.mb.ca/extranet/ipc/index.php stop screening or marking chart ESBL +ve]
[[24 - ESBL or MRO]] (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)
*See: [[Enterococcus -vancomycin-resistant (VRE)]]


[[24 - ESBL or MRO]] (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)
Use with [[:Category:Infection|infection diagnosis]] if it is causing symptoms but we no longer track [[VRE, ESBL and MRO Colonization]].


== coding if both pathogen and ESBL status are known ==
== coding if both pathogen and ESBL status are known ==

Revision as of 15:28, 29 February 2016

24 - ESBL or MRO (extended spectrum beta-lactamase), MRO (meropenem-resistant organism other than Stenotrophomonas)

Use with infection diagnosis if it is causing symptoms but we no longer track VRE, ESBL and MRO Colonization.

coding if both pathogen and ESBL status are known

If both the pathogen name and the ESBL status are know, code the pathogen.

supporting documentation

Question: From: Trish Ostryzniuk Subject: RE: code specific pathogen for an infection or if ESBL then code that?

Example: UTI due to E.Coli which is also ESBL on C&S. No past medical history of ESBL.

What would be the priority to code this type of case:

a. UTI due to E.Coli or

b. UTI due to ESBL

Currently we cannot code both UTI due to E.Coli PLUS UTI due to ESBL .

Answer: From: Anand Kumar

UTI with E coli