TISS28 collection & scanning Survey April 16, 2013
Hi everyone. The new TISS28 has now been in place for 3.5 month. We would like feedback once again from data collectors and from data processing in regards to these forms. Feedback from the data collection & processing front lines is helpful for continued bedside nursing education and also for the main database office to assess for applicable QA checks that could be automated in data processing (see: TISS28 Scanning quality checks), where possible. Beside commenting on compliance in your unit here, I need specific details in regards to items you observe done well or not on new forms.
The last survey done Jan 7.13 was very helpful and the information went back to QA officer, nursing education, ICU TASK team and managers. Also provided main office with important observation when interpreting TISS data and also some tweeking of wording on form.
Dats, thank you in advance for taking the time to comment here.
NOTE; when referring to any items on the TISS28 form, please indicate the TISS28 item number you are referring to. For example, if Hourly vital sign is missed or done well, refer to TISS #2. Thanks again.
Site
HSC
STB
- I find that there is more overall compliance with completing the new form. The problem spots are as follows:
- Cam + is sometimes marked when it is not documented on the flow sheet and sometimes it is missing when it is documented.
- tiss item #12 regarding more than 5L per day IV fluids is usually missed as people are not going back to check if this amount of volume was given.
- Often chest physio and inhalation therapy is missed.
- I always ensure when the extubations are marked as this is sometimes missed.
- I always ensure when the specific interventions and trips out of the ICU are done because this area has commonly missed items also.
- Need to also check the 2300 hr items as these are sometimes done wrong.
- Overall, I find this tiss much easier to trouble shoot and check and compliance is much better. --LKolesar 10:17, 2013 April 16 (EDT)