Task Team Meeting - Rolling Agenda and Minutes 2018
Database Task Group Meeting – June 21, 2017
Present: Allan Garland, Con Marks, Laura Kolesar, Tina Tenbergen, Trish Ostryzniuk
- Absent: Julie Mojica
- Minutes prepared by: AG
- Action items in BOLD
1. Switching over to ICD-10 and CCI
- We set out a timeline, as follows:
- Allan to finalize codes and naming (including acronyms where appropriate) by 7/21/2017 - this will include incorporating the bug list
- Work begins thereafter (with goal of being finished by end of October 2017) on making new Wiki articles for each code. To facilitate this we’ll use the mapping of old-to-new codes we made a few months ago. But, it will also require the data collectors to review the new listings. We will begin an inservicing process as this work proceeds.
- Tina to create the interface for inputting the new coding schema.
- Data collectors to begin “shadow entry” of the new coding on 11/1/2017
- Cease entering the current coding on 1/1/2018
- Regarding identifying diagnoses for which there are specific definitions, Tina created a list of longer Wiki entries, under the presumption that such diagnoses will be included there.
- We should create crosschecks at this early phase of development (e.g. every metastatic dz code must also have a primary source of cancer code).
2.Update on seeking data on PHIN validation data, hospitalization data, and mortality data from WRHA (Phil Jarman).
- Allan reported that he spoke to the WRHA IT lead, Leona Lane (204-926-8086) who is working to set up a meeting including the current WRHA Privacy Officer. We also recognized that Tina should be at that session, to supply information about technologic issues in privacy. Allan will follow-up with Leona.
3. Follow-up on seeking collectors having eChart access. Trish is continuing to look into this.
4. New data collection issues:
- Laura raised the question of how to code the “prior service” for a patient who makes a stop in a procedure area (e.g. cath lab, interventional radiology) on the way from ED to ICU or ward. We agreed that when the patient has actually been admitted to a service (e.g. Neurology for a stroke patient) that it’s easy. It’s less clear when this doesn’t occur, and the proceduralist (e.g. cardiologist, invasive radiologist) is merely doing a procedure. We agreed that we need to include Julie in this discussion, as she knows best how this information is being used.
Next Task Team Meeting: Thursday July 20, 2017 at 10:30 am