Myocardial infarction
Legacy Content
This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:Myocardial infarction, acute (AMI), NOS, Myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute (AMI), transmural (Q-wave), Myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute (AMI), subendocardial/non-transmural (non-Q-wave)Click Expand to show legacy content.
| edit dx infobox | |
| Category/Organ System: |
Category: Myocardial infarction (old) |
|
Type: |
[[:Category:
|
| Main Diagnosis: | 102-xx |
| Sub Diagnosis: | Critical Care and Medicine |
| Diagnosis Code: | Currently Collected |
| Comorbid Diagnosis: | |
| Charlson Comorbid coding (pre ICD10): | |
| Program: | |
| Status: |
|
Criteria
- Documented CPK rise or classic EKG changes
Discussion
- The subdiagnoses are not mutually exclusive, an MI could be both post-op and anterior. What is the precedence with which to collect these? Even if we explain this here, there still is a risk of misunderstanding. I think the ones that are not exclusive shoudl be eliminated. (The same is probably true for other dxs) Ttenbergen 12:51, 18 February 2009 (CST)
- On second thought, would we just code both post-op and anterior, leading to two MI dxs? If so, which goes first, since we report on primary admit DXs? Also, does this lead to higher numbers of MI reported? If a patient in fact has two MIs, one post-op with location unknown, and one anterior when first admitted, would our db report this as just one MI or as several? I will send this to Julie as well.Ttenbergen 12:56, 18 February 2009 (CST)
Data Integrity Rules
- If 102-10 you must not use any another 102 with a subcode.
- This rule is not yet implemented in ACCESS.