Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Data Integrity Check | DIC_summary = * Chart must be numerical * chart must be * checks Function PHIN same as Chart | DIC_related_concepts = PHIN, Chart |...") |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (→Log) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = | | DIC_summary = validates the [[Chart number]]: | ||
* [[Chart]] must be numerical | * [[Chart]] must be numerical | ||
* chart must be | * chart must be | ||
* checks [[Function PHIN same as Chart]] | * checks [[Function PHIN same as Chart]] | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = | * no further checks at this time because chart numbers are different at different hospitals | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = PHIN; Chart number | |||
| DIC_firmness = hard check | | DIC_firmness = hard check | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB. | | DIC_timing = | ||
| DIC_coding = | | DIC_app = CCMDB.accdb | ||
| DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | |||
| DIC_status = implemented | | DIC_status = implemented | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | | DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
The numerical-check | The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown. | ||
== Log == | |||
* 2020-03-11 - confirmed again that a 9-digit chart will throw error; emailed Pagasa | |||
* 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] triggers again | |||
* 2019-08-22 - [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] was triggered even though this check exists | |||
* 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||
{{Related Articles}} | {{Related Articles}} | ||
[[Category:Registry checks]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:11, 2020 March 11
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | validates the Chart number:
|
| Related: | PHIN, Chart number |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | Function Validate_Chart |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2008-01-01 |
| Backlogged: | true |
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown.
Log
- 2020-03-11 - confirmed again that a 9-digit chart will throw error; emailed Pagasa
- 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if PL Chart 9 Digit triggers again
- 2019-08-22 - PL Chart 9 Digit was triggered even though this check exists
- 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date
Related articles
| Related articles: |