Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m nothing changed, just confirming that the >8 digit check was being run. |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Log |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| DIC_firmness = hard check | | DIC_firmness = hard check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB. | | DIC_app = CCMDB.accdb | ||
| DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | | DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | ||
| DIC_status = implemented | | DIC_status = implemented | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
* 2020-03-11 - confirmed again that a 9-digit chart will throw error; emailed Pagasa | |||
* 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] triggers again | |||
* 2019-08-22 - [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] was triggered even though this check exists | |||
* 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date | * 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 2020 March 11
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | validates the Chart number:
|
| Related: | PHIN, Chart number |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | Function Validate_Chart |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2008-01-01 |
| Backlogged: | true |
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown.
Log
- 2020-03-11 - confirmed again that a 9-digit chart will throw error; emailed Pagasa
- 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if PL Chart 9 Digit triggers again
- 2019-08-22 - PL Chart 9 Digit was triggered even though this check exists
- 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date
Related articles
| Related articles: |