AIDS (old code): Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
LKolesar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


[[Category: Infection]]
[[Category: Infection]]
[[Discussion]]
=Discussion=
**I would like to comment that putting AIDS diagnostic code in the category of infection is inappropriate.  I had difficulty finding it as I was looking under immunological problems in "other medical" which would be the expected place to find this.  It is almost as bad as putting mastectomy under GI/GU OR which is where it is.  Would anyone think to find it there??  I think our codes should be reorganized under their appropriate category.  I even made a list of these inappropriately categorized codes about a year ago.  Would it be too difficult to do this??--[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 09:46, 14 January 2010 (CST)

Revision as of 09:46, 14 January 2010

Legacy Content

This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:AIDS (disease due to HIV)

Click Expand to show legacy content.


edit dx infobox
Category/Organ
System:
[[:Category: Infection (old)]]

Type:

Medical Problem

Main Diagnosis: AIDS
Sub Diagnosis: AIDS
Diagnosis Code: 8700
Comorbid Diagnosis: YES
Charlson Comorbid coding (pre ICD10): 6
Program: CC & Med
Status: Currently Collected


[[Category: Infection (old)]]Notes:


  • mutually exclusive with HIV+

Discussion

Discussion

    • I would like to comment that putting AIDS diagnostic code in the category of infection is inappropriate. I had difficulty finding it as I was looking under immunological problems in "other medical" which would be the expected place to find this. It is almost as bad as putting mastectomy under GI/GU OR which is where it is. Would anyone think to find it there?? I think our codes should be reorganized under their appropriate category. I even made a list of these inappropriately categorized codes about a year ago. Would it be too difficult to do this??--LKolesar 09:46, 14 January 2010 (CST)