Query check has transfer ready date or checkbox: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{Data Integrity Check |DIC_summary=make sure there are sensibly dated entries |DIC_related_concepts=Service tmp entry; Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry |DIC_coding=none yet |DIC..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Data Integrity Check
{{Data Integrity Check
|DIC_summary=make sure there are sensibly dated entries
|DIC_summary=make sure there are sensibly dated entries
|DIC_related_concepts=Service tmp entry; Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry
|DIC_related_concepts=Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry
|DIC_coding=none yet
|DIC_coding=none yet
|DIC_status=needs review
|DIC_status=needs review
Line 9: Line 9:


*  make sure there either is an TR entry for each [[Level of care hierarchy]] component of the stay, or the "no entry" rules are followed correctly
*  make sure there either is an TR entry for each [[Level of care hierarchy]] component of the stay, or the "no entry" rules are followed correctly
== Needs review ==
{{Discuss |
* On a first read I am not sure how we would make sure this exists for each level of care; it would be a complicated query; how badly do we want this?
* Is there a simplified version that only makes sure a first entry exists, and that any entry that does exist is internally consistent (no time checkbox vs having a time vs presence of acceptable comment entry)
}}


{{Data Integrity Check List}}
{{Data Integrity Check List}}

Revision as of 22:45, 15 October 2020

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: make sure there are sensibly dated entries
Related: Transfer Ready DtTm tmp entry
Firmness: not entered
Timing: always
App: CCMDB.accdb
Coding: none yet
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: needs review
Implementation Date: not entered
Backlogged: No
  • Cargo


  • SMW


  • Categories:  
  • form:
  • make sure there either is an TR entry for each Level of care hierarchy component of the stay, or the "no entry" rules are followed correctly

Needs review

  • On a first read I am not sure how we would make sure this exists for each level of care; it would be a complicated query; how badly do we want this?
  • Is there a simplified version that only makes sure a first entry exists, and that any entry that does exist is internally consistent (no time checkbox vs having a time vs presence of acceptable comment entry)
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)

none found

Related articles

Related articles: