Bacteremia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Ttenbergen moved page Bacteremia, NOS to Bacteremia without leaving a redirect |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 15:06, 4 April 2018
| ICD10 Diagnosis | |
| Dx: | Bacteremia |
| ICD10 code: | A49.9 |
| Pre-ICD10 counterpart: | none assigned |
| Charlson/ALERT Scale: | none |
| APACHE Como Component: | none |
| APACHE Acute Component: | none |
| Start Date: | |
| Stop Date: | |
| Data Dependencies(Reports/Indicators/Data Elements): | No results |
| External ICD10 Documentation | |
This diagnosis is a part of ICD10 collection.
Additional Info
- Bacteremia is a lab finding, not a disease. Following our general rule, code symptoms, signs and diagnostic abnormalities when the underlying CAUSE is unknown. If that cause is known, then of course you must code it, and coding the abnormal finding is optional.
- So, if the patient has a known infection AND/OR Severe sepsis OR Shock, septic you MUST code those.
Alternate ICD10s to consider coding instead or in addition
- Shock, septic
- Severe sepsis
- Sepsis (SIRS due to infection, without acute organ failure)
- Any infection that is the source of this bacteremia.
- Fungemia, NOS
- Bacterial infection, NOS
- Fever or fever of unknown origin (FUO)
Candidate Combined ICD10 codes
- Code the organism. Template:DiscussAllan
- AG REPLY: Because this code is one of the "symptom or findings" codes, and not a true diagnosis, I don't expect it'll be used very much. Here the "NOS" doesn't refer to the bug, but to the fact that it's a miscellaneous bacterial infection. Probably what we should do is remove the "NOS" from the title.
- Others, as mentioned above.
Related CCI Codes
Related Articles
Show all ICD10 Subcategories
|
ICD10 Categories: |