Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Log |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "CCMDB.mdb" to "CCMDB.accdb" |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| DIC_firmness = hard check | | DIC_firmness = hard check | ||
| DIC_timing = | | DIC_timing = | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB. | | DIC_app = CCMDB.accdb | ||
| DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | | DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | ||
| DIC_status = implemented | | DIC_status = implemented | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 22 September 2019
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | validates the Chart number:
|
| Related: | PHIN, Chart number |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | Function Validate_Chart |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2008-01-01 |
| Backlogged: | true |
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown.
Log
- 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if PL Chart 9 Digit triggers again
- 2019-08-22 - PL Chart 9 Digit was triggered even though this check exists
- 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date
Related articles
| Related articles: |