Retained Secretions/Mucous Plug/Atelectasis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
{{discussion}} | {{discussion}} | ||
* When a pt. is being suctioned orally and or nasally I code as retained secretions. is this common practice for data collectors? | * When a pt. is being suctioned orally and or nasally I code as retained secretions. is this common practice for data collectors?--15:45, 19 February 2010 SKiesman | ||
**I never have coded it for the fact that they are being suctioned. I code it if it shows up on a chest Xray as a problem or they have respiratory distress. I have quite a few CVA patients in high observation that require suctioning.I don't code it as a complication of the CVA unless they have respiratory distress.[[User:GHall|GHall]] 18:43, 21 February 2010 (CST) | **I never have coded it for the fact that they are being suctioned. I code it if it shows up on a chest Xray as a problem or they have respiratory distress. I have quite a few CVA patients in high observation that require suctioning.I don't code it as a complication of the CVA unless they have respiratory distress.[[User:GHall|GHall]] 18:43, 21 February 2010 (CST) | ||
**I too only use the code if the retained secretions are causing resp. ditress.--[[User:MWaschuk|MWaschuk]] 10:44, 22 February 2010 (CST) | **I too only use the code if the retained secretions are causing resp. ditress.--[[User:MWaschuk|MWaschuk]] 10:44, 22 February 2010 (CST) | ||
**I do the same, it is only coded if an intervention & resp. distress is documented.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 15:10, 22 February 2010 (CST) | **I do the same, it is only coded if an intervention & resp. distress is documented.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 15:10, 22 February 2010 (CST) | ||
**I code the same as Con and Mary-Lou [[User:BDeVlaming|BDeVlaming]] 10:30, 24 February 2010 (CST) | **I code the same as Con and Mary-Lou [[User:BDeVlaming|BDeVlaming]] 10:30, 24 February 2010 (CST) | ||
**I code it the same as Gail and Marylou. Only if it causes resp distress/obstruction/reintubation. [[User:NMiller|NMiller]] 20:08, 25 February 2010 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:08, 26 February 2010
Legacy Content
This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:AtelectasisClick Expand to show legacy content.
| edit dx infobox | |
| Category/Organ System: |
Category: Respiratory (old) |
|
Type: |
|
| Main Diagnosis: | Other Problems |
| Sub Diagnosis: | Retained Secretions/Mucous Plug/Atelectasis |
| Diagnosis Code: | 3022 |
| Comorbid Diagnosis: | No |
| Charlson Comorbid coding (pre ICD10): | 0 |
| Program: | |
| Status: |
|
Discussion
- When a pt. is being suctioned orally and or nasally I code as retained secretions. is this common practice for data collectors?--15:45, 19 February 2010 SKiesman
- I never have coded it for the fact that they are being suctioned. I code it if it shows up on a chest Xray as a problem or they have respiratory distress. I have quite a few CVA patients in high observation that require suctioning.I don't code it as a complication of the CVA unless they have respiratory distress.GHall 18:43, 21 February 2010 (CST)
- I too only use the code if the retained secretions are causing resp. ditress.--MWaschuk 10:44, 22 February 2010 (CST)
- I do the same, it is only coded if an intervention & resp. distress is documented.--CMarks 15:10, 22 February 2010 (CST)
- I code the same as Con and Mary-Lou BDeVlaming 10:30, 24 February 2010 (CST)
- I code it the same as Gail and Marylou. Only if it causes resp distress/obstruction/reintubation. NMiller 20:08, 25 February 2010 (CST)