VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: Difference between revisions

GHall (talk | contribs)
GHall (talk | contribs)
Line 74: Line 74:
** If the criteria all clearly show a VAP then the doctor should be informed about this. (...) --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 15:26, 28 January 2011 (CST)  (partial comment moved)
** If the criteria all clearly show a VAP then the doctor should be informed about this. (...) --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 15:26, 28 January 2011 (CST)  (partial comment moved)
** (...) If it meets our criteria of VAP I code it as VAP and discuss with the charge/bedside nurse or MD on shift in the unit (usually not the attending)
** (...) If it meets our criteria of VAP I code it as VAP and discuss with the charge/bedside nurse or MD on shift in the unit (usually not the attending)
***My understanding is that those are '''guidelines'''even if it says criteria. I have no problem with the 48 hour rule, the infiltrate present and the treatment with antibiotics. The second set of rules I think are unrealistic. For many reasons. If they are ventilated for 48hours, have a new infiltrate and a bug growing and the doctors are calling it VAP I think we should regardless of our guidelines.If we don't get this right it will look like some sites are over reporting and some under reporting.I'll add it to the team meeting agenda[[User:GHall|GHall]] 18:17, 9 September 2011 (CDT)
[[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 16:52, 3 February 2011 (CST) (partial comment moved)


=== False Positives ===
=== False Positives ===