Postal Code field: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
CMarks (talk | contribs)
missing postal codes and how to code them
Line 7: Line 7:
== Collection Instruction ==
== Collection Instruction ==
[[Postal code collection]] will be moved to or referenced from here.
[[Postal code collection]] will be moved to or referenced from here.
**Will there be some way to indicate that the postal code is unknown? Currently we have a spot to check off.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 15:03, 2016 April 11 (CDT)
 
=== postal code missing ===
{{discussion}}
*Will there be some way to indicate that the postal code is unknown? Currently we have a spot to check off.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 15:03, 2016 April 11 (CDT)
** Good catch! I will need to come up with something when I implement the integrity checks. Probably something along the lines of typing "none", rather than an extra field. Think that would work? Ttenbergen 18:20, 2016 April 11 (CDT)


== Data Use ==
== Data Use ==
Line 15: Line 19:
{{dicsussion}}
{{dicsussion}}
Need to re-implement existing checks for this field.  
Need to re-implement existing checks for this field.  
see also [[#postal code missing]]


== Implementation ==
== Implementation ==

Revision as of 17:20, 2016 April 11

This field is currently being implemented, please check the instructions and put a discussion for anything that isn't clear. 

The Postal_Code field will contain Postal code collection data.

The field will move to a different tab probably, not sure yet how things will look when the old fields are all cleaned out. Thoughts? Template:Discussion

Collection Instruction

Postal code collection will be moved to or referenced from here.

postal code missing

Template:Discussion

  • Will there be some way to indicate that the postal code is unknown? Currently we have a spot to check off.--CMarks 15:03, 2016 April 11 (CDT)
    • Good catch! I will need to come up with something when I implement the integrity checks. Probably something along the lines of typing "none", rather than an extra field. Think that would work? Ttenbergen 18:20, 2016 April 11 (CDT)

Data Use

Postal code collection will be moved to or referenced from here.

Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks

Template:Dicsussion Need to re-implement existing checks for this field. see also #postal code missing

Implementation

Legacy

Data started out being collected in the tmp field.