Postal Code field: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) How to collect if there is no postal code. rolling out with next version. |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Collection Instruction == | == Collection Instruction == | ||
Enter the Postal code | |||
* no space | |||
* upper case letters | |||
* example only: X0X0X0 | |||
When the postal code is '''not''' available enter "N/A" or click the "N/A" button to enter it for you. | |||
=== | === Special Cases === | ||
Consider special cases from [[Postal code collection]] for now, I will move those over here when we set the old field to legacy. Please comment here though if the instructions for old field would not work in new setup. | |||
== Data Use == | == Data Use == | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 2016 April 18
This field is currently being implemented, please check the instructions and put a discussion for anything that isn't clear.
The Postal_Code field will contain Postal code collection data.
The field will move to a different tab probably, not sure yet how things will look when the old fields are all cleaned out. Thoughts? Template:Discussion
Collection Instruction
Enter the Postal code
- no space
- upper case letters
- example only: X0X0X0
When the postal code is not available enter "N/A" or click the "N/A" button to enter it for you.
Special Cases
Consider special cases from Postal code collection for now, I will move those over here when we set the old field to legacy. Please comment here though if the instructions for old field would not work in new setup.
Data Use
Postal code collection will be moved to or referenced from here.
Template:CCMDB Data Integrity Checks
- will no longer need query s_tmp_Postal_duplicate
Need to re-implement existing checks for this field. see also #postal code missing
Implementation
Legacy
Data started out being collected in the tmp field.