Province field
The Province field records the province that the patient is registered with health care. If the patient is not eligible for health care, enter the province that they reside in.
The field draws its options from the S_Provinces table on the PDA and in the CCMDB.mdb.
Choose the value for the "Province" field from the dropdown lists in Access. The provincial abbreviations are the same as for mailing. In addition to the provinces you have the following options:
- US United States
- CF Canadian Forces
- NK Not Known / Not available
- OS Outside of North America
Data Integrity Checks
See PHIN field for details on how the Province field and the PHIN field relate.
Should we have a CF entry? How is it used?
Template:Discussion This will probably address the two sub-headings.
All province entries except CF are geographical and administrative. CF is only administrative. If we are interested in flagging patients who live in a province but are not insured by that province we would also need to track First Nations, RCMP and resident aliens like visa students. I don't think we care to break out the rest, so for consistency the "CF" province entry should be eliminated.
- Julie/Trish, is there any reason to keep CF separate? Has anyone request ever included this as a criterion? Ttenbergen 12:01, 2012 September 6 (CDT)
- no.-Trish Ostryzniuk 19:18, 2012 November 13 (EST)
- So, why do we code it separately? How is it used? Answer will affect question below as well. Ttenbergen 12:53, 2013 February 11 (EST)
- no.-Trish Ostryzniuk 19:18, 2012 November 13 (EST)
Precedence of CF over residence province
- Does CF take precedence over the province where someone lives? Ttenbergen 12:01, 2012 September 6 (CDT)
- Usually flagging a patient as a member of the CF is to ensure billing is properly handled. I wouldn't have thought it matters to CCMDB who's paying the bill--they are patient in a WRHA hospital receiving care and for which data should be collected. Ditto for TISS. -- Fred Schumacher 17:12, 2012 November 13 (EST)
- I don't think you meant to include TISS here. I believe we tagged patients as CF because they did not a MB health number, or it was some long number and so when we sent for crosschecking to MB Health and they find no match, we have a reason why no match was found. Julie might remember since she has taken over the crosschecking with MB Health. Julie also may have some idea's on this based on what she or Pagasa see coming back from MB health. -Trish Ostryzniuk 19:17, 2012 November 13 (EST)
- Usually flagging a patient as a member of the CF is to ensure billing is properly handled. I wouldn't have thought it matters to CCMDB who's paying the bill--they are patient in a WRHA hospital receiving care and for which data should be collected. Ditto for TISS. -- Fred Schumacher 17:12, 2012 November 13 (EST)
CF family members not coded as CF
Medical coverage for CF dependents is covered by the province in which they live. They do not receive any healthcare services from the CF.