APACHE II Background: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''APACHE''' stands for '''A'''cute '''P'''hysiological and '''C'''hronic '''H'''ealth '''E'''valuation [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APACHE_II  APACHE II on the Wikipedia]
'''APACHE''' stands for '''A'''cute '''P'''hysiological and '''C'''hronic '''H'''ealth '''E'''valuation [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APACHE_II  APACHE II on the Wikipedia].
 
This page is part of [[:Category:APACHE II]], where you can find the links to many APACHE topics.


== Who was it developed by ==
== Who was it developed by ==
Line 11: Line 13:
== What are the components ==   
== What are the components ==   
* APS— The Acute Physiology Score captures acute severity of illness. (max score = 60). 12 physiological variables from one or more of the body’s seven major vital physiologic systems:  
* APS— The Acute Physiology Score captures acute severity of illness. (max score = 60). 12 physiological variables from one or more of the body’s seven major vital physiologic systems:  
**neurological,
**neurological ([[Glasgow Coma Scale]])
**cardiovascular,
**cardiovascular
**respiratory,
**respiratory
**gastrointestinal,
**gastrointestinal
**renal,
**renal
**metabolic &
**metabolic  
**hematologic
**hematologic  
* [[APACHE_Scoring_table#Age_Points|'''Age''']] group (max score = 6)       
* [[APACHE_Scoring_table#Age_Points|'''Age''']] group (max score = 6)       
* history of a underlying [[Chronic Health APACHE | '''Chronic Health condition''']] reflecting diminished physiologic reserve (max score = 5).   
* History of a underlying [[Chronic Health APACHE | '''Chronic Health condition''']] reflecting diminished physiologic reserve (max score = 5).   


Max Total Apache Score = 71
Max Total Apache Score = 71
see [[:Category:APACHE II Physiological Variables]]


=== Weighting of scores ===
=== Weighting of scores ===
Each physiological variable selected has been weighted with a score ranging from 0-4 points to reflect severity.
*Each physiological variable selected has been weighted with a score ranging from 0-4 points to reflect severity.
*Physiological variables with the worst deviation from normal have been assigned the higher points.
*Note about renal scoring (see also [[ARF_(APACHE)]]):
**The point scores for serum creatinine are doubled if [[ARF_(APACHE)]] is checked (which would be if [[Kidney, acute renal failure NOS]] is present).  Note that even relatively small rises in serum creatinine are associated with higher rates of death for ICU patients, as indicated in [https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201311-2097OC Small Acute Increases in Serum Creatinine Are Associated with Decreased Long-Term Survival in the Critically Ill]
*See [[APACHE Scoring table]] for details.


Physiological variables with the worst deviation from normal have been asigned the higher points.
== Collection Guidelines ==
see [[Apache II General Collection Guidelines]]


=== Timing of collection ===
see [[APACHE physiological variable collection]]
Deviation in physiologic variables are selected during a patients '''first 24 hours''' in ICU.


== How were these Varibles Selected ==
== How were these Variables Selected ==
Knaus and his team, which included a panel of 7 experienced ICU physicians from major centers and specialies, reviewed  
Knaus and his team, which included a panel of 7 experienced ICU physicians from major centers and specialies, reviewed  
literature for measurements that had demonstrated promise in estimating severity of illness and that were generally tested and  
literature for measurements that had demonstrated promise in estimating severity of illness and that were generally tested and  
recorded in most ICU’s. The weighted score that the panel assigned to particular physiologic values was based on the fact that the more deviated from normal the value was, the more concern and by inference, the  more severly ill a patient is.  
recorded in most ICU’s. The weighted score that the panel assigned to particular physiologic values was based on the fact that the more deviated from normal the value was, the more concern and by inference, the  more severly ill a patient is.


==References==
==References==
*Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE - Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation: A physiologically based classification system. '' Critical Care Medicine'', Vol 9: 591-597, 1981.
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=3928249 Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system.  ''Critical Care Medicine'' 1985; 13818-29.]
 
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Evaluating+Outcome+from+Intensive+Care%3A+A+preliminary+multihospital+comparison Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE, Birnbunm, ML, Cullen DJ, Kohles MK, Baedhyo S, Snyder JV: Evaluating Outcome from Intensive Care: A preliminary multihospital comparison. ''Critical Care Medicine'', Vol 10: 491-496, 1982. ]
 
*[https://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/700316/evaluation-outcome-from-intensive-care-major-medical-centers Knaus WA, Draper EA,  Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. An Evaluation of Outcome from the Intensive Care in Major Medical Centers. Annuals of Internal Medicine, Vol 104: No 3: 410-418, 1986.]


*Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE, Birnbunm, ML, Cullen DJ, Kohles MK, Baedhyo S, Snyder JV: Evaluating Outcome from Intensive Care: A preliminary multihospital comparison. ''Critical Care Medicine'', Vol 10: 491-496, 1982.
*Original APACHE, not the one we use: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7261642 Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE - Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation: A physiologically based classification system. '' Critical Care Medicine'', Vol 9: 591-597, 1981.]


*Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system.  ''Critical Care Medicine'' 1985; 13818-29.
== Related articles ==
{{Related Articles}}


*Knaus WA, Draper EA,  Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. An Evaluation of Outcome from the Intensive Care in Major Medical Centers. Annuals of Internal Medicine, Vol 104: No 3: 410-418, 1986.


[[Category:APACHE II]]
[[Category:APACHE II]]

Latest revision as of 12:03, 2022 December 22

APACHE stands for Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation APACHE II on the Wikipedia.

This page is part of Category:APACHE II, where you can find the links to many APACHE topics.

Who was it developed by

A conceptual model for the APACHE prognostic scoring system was formulated in 1979 and introduced in 1981 by by Dr. William A. Knaus et.al. George Washington University Medical Center. APACHE was validate in many centers since then and shown to be a strong and stable predictor of hospital survival.

  • APACHE II was developed in 1985.
  • APACHE III was developed in 1991.

Purpose

Designed to be a objective and quantitative measure of the severity of illness of acutely ill patient in ICU. The severity of disease classification system also assists in the ability to prognosticate outcome or evaluate the impact of subsequent care in ICU. APACHE scores can help identify those patient that would or would not benefit from ICU admission and treatment.

What are the components

  • APS— The Acute Physiology Score captures acute severity of illness. (max score = 60). 12 physiological variables from one or more of the body’s seven major vital physiologic systems:
    • neurological (Glasgow Coma Scale)
    • cardiovascular
    • respiratory
    • gastrointestinal
    • renal
    • metabolic
    • hematologic
  • Age group (max score = 6)
  • History of a underlying Chronic Health condition reflecting diminished physiologic reserve (max score = 5).

Max Total Apache Score = 71

see Category:APACHE II Physiological Variables

Weighting of scores

Collection Guidelines

see Apache II General Collection Guidelines

see APACHE physiological variable collection

How were these Variables Selected

Knaus and his team, which included a panel of 7 experienced ICU physicians from major centers and specialies, reviewed literature for measurements that had demonstrated promise in estimating severity of illness and that were generally tested and recorded in most ICU’s. The weighted score that the panel assigned to particular physiologic values was based on the fact that the more deviated from normal the value was, the more concern and by inference, the more severly ill a patient is.

References

Related articles

Related articles: