Centralized data Vetting Process: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Set record as vetted == | == Set record as vetted == | ||
* last: set [[Record Status field]] to | * last: set [[Record Status field]] to ... how does "vetted" sound? if so, get rid of this comment. Ttenbergen 15:01, 2014 January 16 (CST) {{discussion}} | ||
[[Category:2013 data upgrades]] | [[Category:2013 data upgrades]] | ||
[[Category:Data Processing]] | [[Category:Data Processing]] | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 2014 January 16
see Basic Analysis Capabilities for functionality not related to vetting new data
Need to resolve all http://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/Centralized_data_Vetting_Process
Check for problems
Use Centralized data front end.mdb "NDC" (New Data Check) queries and fix data as needed:
- NDC_PHIN_Fake (renamed for consistency)
- NDC_SamePT_Site_Diff_chart - fix
- NDC_Chart_9_Digit - fix
- NDC_DiffPhin_SameLN_FN_DOB - confirm correct (do we have a list for false positives?), fix if needs
- NDC_SamePhinDiff_LN_FN_DOB_Sex - confirm correct (do we have a list for false positives?), fix if needs
Make PseudoPHINs
- NDC_PHIN_Blank (renamed for consistency)
- NDC_Highest_PseudoPHIN
any other checks after pseudoPhin?
Set record as vetted
- last: set Record Status field to ... how does "vetted" sound? if so, get rid of this comment. Ttenbergen 15:01, 2014 January 16 (CST) Template:Discussion