Violent 2nd to dementia

From CCMDB Wiki
Revision as of 11:37, 2009 September 21 by LKolesar (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Legacy Content

This page is about the pre-ICD10 diagnosis coding schema. See the ICD10 Diagnosis List, or the following for similar diagnoses in ICD10:Violent behavior

Click Expand to show legacy content.


edit dx infobox
Category/Organ
System:
Category: Neurological (old)

Type:

Category: Medical Problem (old)

Main Diagnosis: Violent Behaviour
Sub Diagnosis: VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR
Diagnosis Code: 538-00
Comorbid Diagnosis: No
Charlson Comorbid coding (pre ICD10): 0
Program: Critical Care and Medicine
Status: Currently Collected
Start Date: May 27, 2004

The full name in the coding guide is "VIOLENT BEHAVIOR - 2nd TO MODERATE/ SEVERE DEMENTIA" but had to be shortened to fit on the PDA.

Causes for Violent behaviour

Can collectors please provide examples of other reasons besides Dementia that is causing violent behavior on wards????TOstryzniuk 17:06, 29 July 2008 (CDT)

Template:Discussion

Discussion

Value of collecting VB

  • Most of the examples listed here are conditions that can cause violent behavior. This is well known, i.e. if there is a diagnosis of psychosis, then violent behavior should probably be expected. If something is part of a diagnosis, it should not have to be coded separately, should it? If someone has an appendectomy we would not want to code "sutures", right? So, my question is, is there value in recording VB in this case? Ttenbergen 16:37, 20 April 2009 (CDT)
  • I agree that 2nd to dementia should not be part of the VB code (538). There are definitely other reasons for VB, ICU psychosis ( a well documented ICU complication) is one of them. I think this should be left generic without a subcode. --LKolesar 11:37, 21 September 2009 (CDT)
    • My humble answer is yes , it is definitely NB to record VB as with your example all surgeries require some form of sutures, clips, etc however, not all of the disease and trauma's listed cause VB 100% of the time...it is an abberant occurance that requires tons of staff/time and interventions........ W. Turner(SOGH)
      • Trish, Julie: Are we actually reporting on VB in any of the ways Wendy mentions?

Extending Vb to non-dementia cases

  • From the list of diagnoses it sounds like there are cases of VB we will not track if a collector follows the exact description. Should the "secondary to dementia" requirement be removed? Are we coding VB only for dementia at this time or for the other causes as well? Maybe sub-code 538?Ttenbergen 11:25, 21 September 2009 (CDT)

Template:Stub