Page values for "Dispo field"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_modificationDateDatetime2025-11-14 8:03:52 PM
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2016 Time and Place changes Admit/Discharge Change explainer page Data Collection Guide Data structure Dispo End-of-life related data L Log table Questions Registry Data
_pageIDInteger4,229
_pageNamePageDispo field
_pageTitleString

Dispo field

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Data_Element" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
field_nameStringdispo
CCMDB_labelStringDispo
CCMDB_tabWikitext string

Dispo

descriptionWikitext

The Dispo field contains information about what happens to the patient at the end of their admission.

tablesList of Page, delimiter: ,L Log table
data_typeStringnumber
datafield_lengthStringlong
program_collectingStringMed and CC
created_rawStringRaw
start_dateDate2016-07-01
end_dateDate2300-01-01
sortInteger41

"Discussions" values

4 rows are stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
whoTextall
questionWikitext
  • does this include patients who are discharged home with private nursing service? (steph)
    • With "this" do you mean "TRSF Group/Supportive housing"? I would not have thought so. If you mean "Home with Support Services", good question. How would HIS use it (aside from getting it wrong at times)? We should probably stick with their definition for consistency. Convince me otherwise. Julie also might have thoughts on how we would use this entry, will flag for her. Ttenbergen 01:02, 24 October 2025 (CDT)
  • I think this would be belong under home with support services, but do the virtual wards fall under transfer to Group/Supportive housing? Lisa Kaita 14:03, 14 November 2025 (CST)
FieldField typeValue
whoTextTask
questionWikitext

JALT I thought we had decided at JALT to collect this as presented by EPR... do I remember this wrong? I had already added it in CCMDB.accdb Change Log 2025#2025-03-11-1. Ttenbergen 22:52, 11 March 2025 (CDT)

  • Yes, I saw that, come to think of it I don't think we decided, not in my notes, but we can use it and I will change the wiki instructions Lisa Kaita 11:25, 13 March 2025 (CDT)
  • If we are going to collect this detail for dispo, should we consider whether or not to also look at SH in preadmit living situation?, currently lumped with community facility with support. Lisa Kaita 14:45, 16 April 2025 (CDT)
  • The entry name includes "TRSF" - is the entry for the previous location equivalent in EPR? Ttenbergen 23:30, 16 April 2025 (CDT)
  • no because the previous location would usually be <site>_ER Lisa Kaita 09:53, 28 May 2025 (CDT)
    • Sorry, I should have asked about "pre-hospital location in ADT". Ttenbergen 16:21, 28 May 2025 (CDT)
FieldField typeValue
whoTextall
questionWikitext

If this is actually done then why don't we just make the nursing stations available? We already have s_dispo table entries for them. 35 entries since 2016, 6 in the last 12 months. Are there other things for which this entry is used? Checked for reasons for this decision but they don't appear documented Ttenbergen 19:42, 13 March 2025 (CDT)

FieldField typeValue
whoTextLisa
questionWikitext

That more detailed info included things like HSC Lennox Bell; we discussed whether or not we need to document the details of this. If so, the following is likely a starting point:

  • Home
  • Home with support
  • Institution NOS
  • TRSF Group/Supportive housing
  • TRSF to Correctional Facility
  • any Hospices
  • GH-Transitional care
  • HSC - Transitional care
  • Misericordia - Transitional care
  • STB - Transitional care
  • VIC - Transitional care
  • HSC Lennox Bell
  • Manitoba Adolescent Treatment Center - unknown/other
    • what is this about again? we already collect these with the exception of the transitional care units, which don't exist, at GH, HSC, SBGH and VIC, but there is a TCU at Miseri and DLC Lisa Kaita 21:18, 6 September 2025 (CDT)
      • we discussed whether we should shift to EPR's "TRSF to Residential Care" and decided not to because our data is more granular. But we should be able to compare to their TRSF, so should understand which of our data would compare to theirs, and how. I think the above is a list of what we have in dispo, so which of those correspond do what listing in EPR? Ttenbergen 10:31, 8 September 2025 (CDT)