Coordination of data between collectors: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (removed old task question since there was nothing left to address in there.)
m (removed a part that has nothing to do with Coordination of data between collectors and is documented elsewhere.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page provides guidelines how much communication should happen when patients re transferred from one ward/unit where we collect to another.  
This page provides a guideline about how much information should be communicated between collectors, when patients are transferred from one collection unit/service to another.  


== Things that should be communicated ==
== Items to be Communicated ==
Information related to:
Information related to:
* [[CAP-Community Acquired Pneumonia]] vs [[VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia]] vs [[HAP-Hospital Acquired Pneumonia]]
* [[CAP-Community Acquired Pneumonia]] vs [[VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia]] vs [[HAP-Hospital Acquired Pneumonia]]
* [[Central Line Related Blood stream Infection (CLR-BSI)]]
* [[Central Line Related Blood stream Infection (CLR-BSI)]]
* cultured [[Pathogens]] that are returned after a patient moves on to another unit (see also [[Lab and culture reports]])
* Results of cultured [[Pathogens]] that become available ''after'' a patient moves to another unit (see also [[Lab and culture reports]]).


== Things that should not be communicated outside of unusual circumstances ==
Use the [["generate email" button]] to communicate this information to the next/previous collector.
'''Don't''' coordinate times, regular collection instructions for those are good enough. See
* [[Dispo DtTm]]
* [[Arrive DtTm]]


== When you ''do'' communicate ==
== Items not to be Communicated ==
Use the [["generate email" button]] to inform the collector at the next/previous location.
Admit, acquired or comorbid codes do not need to be communicated, aside from the ones mentioned above.


Also use the [["generate email" button]] to send notifications re. VAPs/CLI. See [[Contacting Quality Officer and Manager for VAPs and CLIs]].
It is not necessary to coordinate transfer times when patients move from one collection location to another.


== Reasons why remaining collection should be done independently ==
== Reasons why remaining collection should be done independently ==
Line 21: Line 18:
For patients who moved from one unit or ward to another unit and ward, it is essential that collection of diagnosis and comorbids must be done independently by the data collector of each unit for the following reasons:
For patients who moved from one unit or ward to another unit and ward, it is essential that collection of diagnosis and comorbids must be done independently by the data collector of each unit for the following reasons:


# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data  - We would like to collect as much information as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may have been recorded by another.  
# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data  - We would like to collect as much information as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may be recorded by another.  
# A measure of precision or repeatability – In a scientific methodology, a measurement process is considered valid if it is accurate and precise.  A measure of precision is related to the degree by which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions will show the same results.  We are interested to know the degree of ‘same ‘or ‘different’ results our measurement process has. In the past, we did a peer audit but did not have the chance to continue since then for various reasons. We have the opportunity to do this currently in selective data (e.g. diagnosis and comorbids) and particularly for the group of patients who stayed in  more than ward/unit during a hospital stay. It must be emphasized that this measure cannot be determined if data are just being transferred from one person to another.  
# A measure of precision or repeatability – In scientific methodology, a measurement process is considered valid if it is accurate and precise.  A measure of precision is related to the degree by which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions will show the same results.  We are interested to know the degree of ‘same ‘or ‘different’ results our measurement process has. In the past we did a peer audit, but did not have the chance to continue since then for various reasons. We have the opportunity to do this currently in selective data (e.g. diagnosis and comorbids) and particularly for the group of patients who stayed in  more than ward/unit during a hospital stay. It must be emphasized that this measure cannot be determined if data is just being transferred from one person to another.  
# Review and standardization of the process – there is also an opportunity to investigate the causes of discrepancies, if any, and improve the collection guidelines and process.
# Review and standardization of the process – there is also an opportunity to investigate the causes of discrepancies, if any, and improve the collection guidelines and process.


== Related Articles ==
== Related Articles ==

Latest revision as of 15:04, 2022 June 14

This page provides a guideline about how much information should be communicated between collectors, when patients are transferred from one collection unit/service to another.

Items to be Communicated

Information related to:

Use the "generate email" button to communicate this information to the next/previous collector.

Items not to be Communicated

Admit, acquired or comorbid codes do not need to be communicated, aside from the ones mentioned above.

It is not necessary to coordinate transfer times when patients move from one collection location to another.

Reasons why remaining collection should be done independently

Data collection should be done independently for diagnosis and comorbids. For patients who moved from one unit or ward to another unit and ward, it is essential that collection of diagnosis and comorbids must be done independently by the data collector of each unit for the following reasons:

  1. Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data - We would like to collect as much information as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may be recorded by another.
  2. A measure of precision or repeatability – In scientific methodology, a measurement process is considered valid if it is accurate and precise. A measure of precision is related to the degree by which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions will show the same results. We are interested to know the degree of ‘same ‘or ‘different’ results our measurement process has. In the past we did a peer audit, but did not have the chance to continue since then for various reasons. We have the opportunity to do this currently in selective data (e.g. diagnosis and comorbids) and particularly for the group of patients who stayed in more than ward/unit during a hospital stay. It must be emphasized that this measure cannot be determined if data is just being transferred from one person to another.
  3. Review and standardization of the process – there is also an opportunity to investigate the causes of discrepancies, if any, and improve the collection guidelines and process.

Related Articles

Related articles: