Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
** [[Province field]] | ** [[Province field]] | ||
** [[Postal Code]] | ** [[Postal Code]] | ||
* We reviewed a broader cross check proposal | * We reviewed a broader cross check proposal (link below) in some detail in a version available in the history of this page], so if we consider adding this we should confirm that none of those apply to any checks. Or we can ignore and just implement as soft-checks. Thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:28, 17 December 2025 (CST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
[https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Check_pre_acute_consistent&oldid=138792 version with discussion] | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||
Latest revision as of 12:30, 17 December 2025
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | consistency of Pre acute living situation; Dispo; Postal Code and Previous Location |
| Related: | Pre acute living situation, Dispo, Postal Code, Previous Location, Province field |
| Firmness: | soft check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | query check pre acute consistent |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | declined |
| Implementation Date: | not entered |
| Backlogged: | No |
Discussed with Julie; she used to use this as part of Overstay, but that project is no longer so we don't need this.
|
JALT
|
Related articles
| Related articles: |
