Infections in ICD10: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m The different types / categories are better explained already in Template:ICD10 Guideline Infection
Line 1: Line 1:
Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied]] and [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately]]. [[#Coding Antibiotic Resistance]] should also be done when there is one.  
Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied]] and [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately]]. [[#Coding Antibiotic Resistance]] should also be done when there is one.  
== Different infection types related to [[Combined ICD10 codes]] ==
=== Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied ===
[[:category:Infection with implied pathogen|Some infections]] are coded as single codes that imply the pathogen:
{{ListICD10Category | categoryName = Infection with implied pathogen}}
=== Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately ===
[[:category:Infection requiring pathogen|Some infections]] need to be coded as [[Combined ICD10 codes]] of the condition and the pathogen. For example, [[Pneumonia, bacterial]] and [[Streptococcus pneumoniae]].
{{ListICD10Category | categoryName = Infection requiring pathogen}}
=== Potential Infections ===
They can also be coded with diagnoses that can potentially have a pathogen, but don't require one. These are usually disorders that may or may not be infectious in nature.
{{ListICD10Category | categoryName = Potential infection}}


== Which date to use for infections in [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]] ==
== Which date to use for infections in [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]] ==

Revision as of 09:49, 17 September 2018

Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are #Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied and #Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately. #Coding Antibiotic Resistance should also be done when there is one.

Which date to use for infections in Acquired Diagnosis / Complication

For acquired infections ie. cystitis with a positive culture, now that dates are to accompany acquired diagnoses...which date is to be entered,

  • the date culture was sent,
  • the date the positive result was reported,
  • or the date abx was ordered?
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

tangential questions

untreatd positive urine cultures

might be better off in Urine tests, NOS, abnormal or Colonized with organism (not infected) depending how it should be coded.

  • In instances of positive urine cultures that are not tx with abx, what is to be coded? Ie. colonization code combined with abnormal test result?
  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

time restrictions around calling things iatrogenic

  • SMW


  • Cargo


  • Categories

Coding Antibiotic Resistance

Antibiotic resistance is combined-coded, see Antibiotic Resistant Organism for more info.

Lab confirmation of results

See Pathogens#Culture reports

Cross Checks

See