Infections in ICD10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m The different types / categories are better explained already in Template:ICD10 Guideline Infection |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied]] and [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately]]. [[#Coding Antibiotic Resistance]] should also be done when there is one. | Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied]] and [[#Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately]]. [[#Coding Antibiotic Resistance]] should also be done when there is one. | ||
== Which date to use for infections in [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]] == | == Which date to use for infections in [[Acquired Diagnosis / Complication]] == |
Revision as of 09:49, 17 September 2018
Infections in ICD10 are coded somewhat inconsistently. There are #Diagnoses where the pathogen is implied and #Diagnoses where the pathogen must be coded separately. #Coding Antibiotic Resistance should also be done when there is one.
Which date to use for infections in Acquired Diagnosis / Complication
tangential questions
untreatd positive urine cultures
might be better off in Urine tests, NOS, abnormal or Colonized with organism (not infected) depending how it should be coded.
|
time restrictions around calling things iatrogenic
|
Coding Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic resistance is combined-coded, see Antibiotic Resistant Organism for more info.
Lab confirmation of results
Cross Checks
See
- Check Infection requiring pathogen must have pathogen combined code
- Check Infection with implied pathogen must not have a pathogen combined code
- Check Pathogens must have Infection requiring pathogen or Potential Infection
- Check Antibiotic resistance must have pathogen or Infection with implied pathogen