Swap Locations: Difference between revisions

Ppiche (talk | contribs)
SCortilet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
Swing or swap locations are not real locations. While listed as in a swap location, the pt might still be in the old location or already be in a new location that gets entered after. Collectors seem to review the chart, make sense of what actually happened, and enter accordingly. If we engage in this manual sense-making, we can not use not use the [[Cognos EPR Report]] tools cleanly so would need to define how we deal with these patients.
Swing or swap locations are not real locations. While listed as in a swap location, the pt might still be in the old location or already be in a new location that gets entered after. Collectors seem to review the chart, make sense of what actually happened, and enter accordingly. If we engage in this manual sense-making, we can not use not use the [[Cognos EPR Report]] tools cleanly so would need to define how we deal with these patients.


* Swing bed location entries are an example of erroneous entries that can occur at STB site. Whenever a collector encounters an erroneous entry, the best consistent approach is to do an EPR/documentation review to reconcile potential discrepancies. The applicable cognos line(s) can then excluded. Perhaps the discussion below could be either deleted or made legacy?
* Swing/swap bed location entries are an example of entries that can occur at STB site when a patient is temporarily located into a bed in epr for logistical purposes. Whenever a collector encounters this erroneous entry, the best consistent approach is to do an EPR/documentation review to reconcile potential discrepancies. The applicable cognos line(s) can then excluded. Perhaps the discussion below could be either deleted or made legacy?


=== Proposed consistent approach ===
=== Proposed consistent approach ===