Peer Audit: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:04, 24 November 2009 view source Ttenbergen (talk \| contribs) CCMDB_legit, admin, approved, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators 92,405 edits m →Discussion ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:59, 24 November 2009 view source LKolesar (talk \| contribs) approved 2,219 edits →Discussion Newer edit →
Line 131:		Line 131:
	*Sorry lots of question but we would like to be consistent with other locations.[[User:TAngell\|TAngell]] 15:04, 18 November 2009 (CST)		*Sorry lots of question but we would like to be consistent with other locations.[[User:TAngell\|TAngell]] 15:04, 18 November 2009 (CST)

			**We at STB want to know who would need validation (via the audit) on lab and pharmacy counts??? To my knowledge, no one has ever used this data. We are fine with auditing the diagnostics, comorbids and apache scores but auditing labs and pharmacies seems unnecessary, is tedious and time consuming. We would appreciate this being looked at before the audits begin. Thank you. KYM, LAURA and Darlene. --[[User:LKolesar\|LKolesar]] 14:59, 24 November 2009 (CST)