Transfer Tracker.mdb: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
further questions
Line 1: Line 1:
Transfer_Tracker.mdb is a repository of patients currently under collection on our wards or discharged within the last 7 weeks. The amount of time for which data is retained is limited since this is patient information and we can't keep it indefinitely without a good reason.  
Transfer_Tracker.mdb is a repository of patients currently under collection on our wards or discharged within the last 7 weeks. The amount of time for which data is retained is limited since this is patient information and we can't keep it indefinitely without a good reason.  
{{Discussion}}
* Can we get away with retaining less than 7 weeks of discharges? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)
* A collector has suggested adding Admit date and time to transfer tracker[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 15:03, 2012 September 7 (CDT)
** Technically relatively easy. For what purpose do we want this? Again, we are storing patient data here, and making it visible to '''all collectors, even those who never dealt with that patient''', so I'd like to reduce it to what is needed for collection. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)


You can find the transfer tracker at  
You can find the transfer tracker at  
Line 18: Line 12:


== Requested Changes ==
== Requested Changes ==
Please let me know if you would like to see things changed or added. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]]
=== reducing amount of data retained ===
{{Discussion}}
* Can we get away with retaining less than 7 weeks of discharges? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)
 
=== adding admit date and time ===
* A collector has suggested adding Admit date and time to transfer tracker[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 15:03, 2012 September 7 (CDT)
** Technically relatively easy. For what purpose do we want this? Again, we are storing patient data here, and making it visible to '''all collectors, even those who never dealt with that patient''', so I'd like to reduce it to what is needed for collection. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)
 


=== self-updating directory listing ===
=== self-updating directory listing ===

Revision as of 09:05, 2012 September 10

Transfer_Tracker.mdb is a repository of patients currently under collection on our wards or discharged within the last 7 weeks. The amount of time for which data is retained is limited since this is patient information and we can't keep it indefinitely without a good reason.

You can find the transfer tracker at

Regional Server\Output\Transfer_Tracker.mdb

It gets its content from the backup files. Data is updated from the backup files each night, and you can update it to the most current data including today by pressing the update button.

When you open the program, it displays the data that was in the most recent data backup from the last time someone has clicked the "update" button it, and the date of that update in the top left corner.

Bugs

Please let me know if there are problems or the program doesn't work as expected. Ttenbergen

Requested Changes

reducing amount of data retained

Template:Discussion

  • Can we get away with retaining less than 7 weeks of discharges? Ttenbergen 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)

adding admit date and time

  • A collector has suggested adding Admit date and time to transfer trackerTrish Ostryzniuk 15:03, 2012 September 7 (CDT)
    • Technically relatively easy. For what purpose do we want this? Again, we are storing patient data here, and making it visible to all collectors, even those who never dealt with that patient, so I'd like to reduce it to what is needed for collection. Ttenbergen 10:03, 2012 September 10 (CDT)


self-updating directory listing

note for Tina only use self-updating directory listing to import rather than a static list (this doesn't affect functionality while things work, it just makes the program a bit more resilient. Right now there is an error if any site can't be found, and if a new site is added and the hard-code is not amended the site just won't import) Ttenbergen 11:33, 1 March 2011 (CST)