Combined ICD10 codes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Minimum Combined Codes: Min combined codes are now on all dx pages. |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== '''NOT YET FIGURED OUT''' == | == '''NOT YET FIGURED OUT''' == | ||
=== General instruction when to code together === | === General instruction when to code together === | ||
{{Discuss@task | When should two diagnoses be coded as a combined code (ie same priority) vs two tenuously related diagnoses simply both being coded, ie under separate priorities? | {{Discuss@task | When should two diagnoses be coded as a combined code (ie same priority) vs two tenuously related diagnoses simply both being coded, ie under separate priorities? | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 2017 November 17
To code some diagnoses as part of ICD10 collection, several lines of entries in the Patient viewer tab ICD10 need to be grouped together.
To group diagnoses together, use the same Dx Priority for all of them.
Coding instructions
Metastasis
Template:Combined dx metastasis primary
Antibiotic Resistance
Template:Combined dx AB resistance
Trauma with mechanism
Fractures
see also Coding fractures in ICD10 Template:Discussion not yet integrated...
Other co-codes?
Template:Discussion Are there others? What are they?
NOT YET FIGURED OUT
General instruction when to code together
{{Discuss@task | When should two diagnoses be coded as a combined code (ie same priority) vs two tenuously related diagnoses simply both being coded, ie under separate priorities?
Primary Diagnosis within Combined Codes
Transition notes
Yes, this different from how we used to use dx priorities where they had to be unique.
Data
The records are combined by same L_ICD10.Dx Priority.