Coordination of data between collectors: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

* [[CAP-Community Acquired Pneumonia]] vs [[VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia]] vs [[HAP-Hospital Acquired Pneumonia]]

* [[Central Line Related Blood stream Infection (CLR-BSI)]]

* [[QA Septic Shock]]

* cultured [[Pathogens]] that are returned after a patient moves on to another unit

== Things that should not be communicated outside of unusual circumstances ==

'''Don't''' coordinate times, regular collection instructions for those are good enough.

'''Don't''' coordinate times, regular collection instructions for those are good enough. EPR times are what we are currently using, except for ICU the Arrive time is the first vitals time.

* [[Dispo DtTm]]

* [[Arrive DtTm]]

Line 23:

Line 22:

== When you ''do'' communicate ==

Use the [["generate email" button]] to inform the collector at the next/previous location.

Also use the email button to send notifications re. VAPs/CLI. See [[Contacting Quality Officer and Manager for VAPs and CLIs]].

== Reasons why remaining collection should be done independently ==

Data collection should be done independently for diagnosis and comorbids

Data collection should be done independently for diagnosis and comorbids.

For patients who moved from one unit or ward to another unit and ward, it is essential that collection of diagnosis and comorbids must be done independently by the data collector of each unit for the following reasons:

# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data - We would like to collect ~~information~~ as much as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may have been recorded by another.

# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data - We would like to collect as much information as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may have been recorded by another.

# A measure of precision or repeatability – In a scientific methodology, a measurement process is considered valid if it is accurate and precise. A measure of precision is related to the degree by which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions will show the same results. We are interested to know the degree of ‘same ‘or ‘different’ results our measurement process has. In the past, we did a peer audit but did not have the chance to continue since then for various reasons. We have the opportunity to do this currently in selective data (e.g. diagnosis and comorbids) and particularly for the group of patients who stayed in more than ward/unit during a hospital stay. It must be emphasized that this measure cannot be determined if data are just being transferred from one person to another.

# Review and standardization of the process – there is also an opportunity to investigate the causes of discrepancies, if any, and improve the collection guidelines and process.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * [[CAP-Community Acquired Pneumonia]] vs [[VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia]] vs [[HAP-Hospital Acquired Pneumonia]]
 * [[Central Line Related Blood stream Infection (CLR-BSI)]]
-* [[QA Septic Shock]]
 * cultured [[Pathogens]] that are returned after a patient moves on to another unit
 == Things that should not be communicated outside of unusual circumstances ==
-'''Don't''' coordinate times, regular collection instructions for those are good enough.
+'''Don't''' coordinate times, regular collection instructions for those are good enough. EPR times are what we are currently using, except for ICU the Arrive time is the first vitals time.
 * [[Dispo DtTm]]
 * [[Arrive DtTm]]
@@ Line 23: / Line 22: @@
 == When you ''do'' communicate ==
 Use the [["generate email" button]] to inform the collector at the next/previous location.
+Also use the email button to send notifications re. VAPs/CLI. See [[Contacting Quality Officer and Manager for VAPs and CLIs]].
 == Reasons why remaining collection should be done independently ==
-Data collection should be done independently for diagnosis and comorbids
+Data collection should be done independently for diagnosis and comorbids.
 For patients who moved from one unit or ward to another unit and ward, it is essential that collection of diagnosis and comorbids must be done independently by the data collector of each unit for the following reasons:
-# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data  - We would like to collect information as much as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked  by one person may have been recorded by another.
+# Comprehensiveness/Completeness of data  - We would like to collect as much information as possible about the patient’s status/condition. If more than one person collects data on the same patient independently, the items missed/overlooked by one person may have been recorded by another.
 # A measure of precision or repeatability – In a scientific methodology, a measurement process is considered valid if it is accurate and precise.  A measure of precision is related to the degree by which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions will show the same results.   We are interested to know the degree of ‘same ‘or ‘different’ results  our measurement process has.  In the past, we did a peer audit but did not have the chance to continue since then for various reasons.  We have the opportunity to do this currently in selective data (e.g. diagnosis and comorbids)  and particularly for the group of patients who stayed in  more than ward/unit during a hospital stay.  It must be emphasized that this measure cannot be determined if data are just being transferred from one person to another.
 # Review and standardization of the process – there is also an opportunity to investigate the causes of discrepancies, if any,  and improve the collection guidelines and process.