Team Meeting 2022-01-25: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ppiche (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:
* triggering query for database errors
* triggering query for database errors
* vacation planning  
* vacation planning  
'''Collection Staff Vacation Pool Proposal'''
'''The Problem'''
Staff ratio differences among collection sites result in inequity to collector access to needed and/or preferred vacation times.
'''The Solution'''
• Grace site has three collectors (one ICU, two medicine) vacation pool remains the same at three collectors at full staff complement-one collector away for vacation at a time
• STB site split into separate ICU and medicine program vacation pools, each pool then has three collectors at full staff complement that would be equal to Grace. One collector per program away for vacation at a time
• HSC site split into separate ICU and medicine program vacation pools, one pool with three; the other four at full staff complement. One collector per program away for vacation at a time
The proposed solution would address the inherent inequity and disparity among the sites and enhance collector access to needed and/or preferred vacation times with nil adverse impact to the employer. Hard working collection staff are entitled to well-deserved vacation time, and there is ample discretion for the employer to demonstrate increased flexibility and support.
At STB site medicine and ICU program collectors do not cross cover vacation therefore nil adverse impact to the employer with the proposed change.
At Grace site there is nil adverse impact to the employer as the status quo is maintained.
At HSC site there is nil adverse impact to the employer as not all collectors cross cover programs, and cross coverage is done on a voluntary basis via sign up for vacation shifts.
Casuals are available to support program staffing needs.
Employer supported innovative strategies are already implemented at all sites to address current short staffing challenges. Employer supported innovative strategies could also be used to support vacation coverage.
Respectfully submitted,
Pam
* recent publications from the database.  https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Publications,_abstracts,_presentations_using_the_Critical_Care_and_Medicine_Database
* recent publications from the database.  https://ccmdb.kuality.ca/index.php?title=Publications,_abstracts,_presentations_using_the_Critical_Care_and_Medicine_Database



Revision as of 11:18, 24 January 2022

Team Meeting

  • Date: January 25, 2022
  • TIME: 1400-1500
  • Place: TEAMS Meeting


Agenda

1. Call to Order

2. Action Plans

3. Business Arising

  • Database status
  • PHIA requirements- deletion of sent profiles
  • triggering query for database errors
  • vacation planning

Collection Staff Vacation Pool Proposal

The Problem

Staff ratio differences among collection sites result in inequity to collector access to needed and/or preferred vacation times.

The Solution

• Grace site has three collectors (one ICU, two medicine) vacation pool remains the same at three collectors at full staff complement-one collector away for vacation at a time

• STB site split into separate ICU and medicine program vacation pools, each pool then has three collectors at full staff complement that would be equal to Grace. One collector per program away for vacation at a time

• HSC site split into separate ICU and medicine program vacation pools, one pool with three; the other four at full staff complement. One collector per program away for vacation at a time

The proposed solution would address the inherent inequity and disparity among the sites and enhance collector access to needed and/or preferred vacation times with nil adverse impact to the employer. Hard working collection staff are entitled to well-deserved vacation time, and there is ample discretion for the employer to demonstrate increased flexibility and support.

At STB site medicine and ICU program collectors do not cross cover vacation therefore nil adverse impact to the employer with the proposed change.

At Grace site there is nil adverse impact to the employer as the status quo is maintained.

At HSC site there is nil adverse impact to the employer as not all collectors cross cover programs, and cross coverage is done on a voluntary basis via sign up for vacation shifts.

Casuals are available to support program staffing needs.

Employer supported innovative strategies are already implemented at all sites to address current short staffing challenges. Employer supported innovative strategies could also be used to support vacation coverage.

Respectfully submitted,

Pam


4. New Business

5. Round Table Items

6 Next Meeting: Team Meeting 2022-04-26

Related articles

Related articles: