Peer Audit: Difference between revisions

Line 63: Line 63:
{{Discussion}}
{{Discussion}}


==Tina==
{{discussion}}
#Tina, I think the output from Access should have automatic date.  If the collectors repeat the letter C_A or M_A* with the same location and initials and forget to type in the date it will over write file on Regional Server from the previous week if Pagasa did not move it from the Server.  Laura sent the first test patient but no date was included in the label.   
*Tina, I think the output from Access should have automatic date.  If the collectors repeat the letter C_A or M_A* with the same location and initials and forget to type in the date it will over write file on Regional Server from the previous week if Pagasa did not move it from the Server.  Laura sent the first test patient but no date was included in the label.   
#Also, TmpV2_audit_1.mdb.  There is no unique identifier if you allow serial numbers 111, 112 to be reused.  Julie would like some other patient ID's in tmpV2 audit.  I believe she emailed you with changes required in order that she can map to the main database.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:33, 19 November 2009 (CST)
 
*Tina, TmpV2_audit_1.mdb.  There is no unique identifier if you allow serial numbers 111, 112 to be reused.  Julie would like some other patient ID's in tmpV2 audit.  I believe she emailed you with changes required in order that she can map to the main database.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:33, 19 November 2009 (CST)


===Discussion===
===Discussion===