LAU LTC consult: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{DT| for this field the default entry for yes is the LTC Medical application, however I later realized that this is not a consult per se, as some have this completed without an actual consult to LTC (the learning process for this project was confusing, I should have spoken to someone from LTC before starting this) I continued to enter it this way, but also answered "yes" for those that had an actual LTC consult where the dttm were either earlier than the medical application or they did not have a medical application but had a LTC consult, I noted details in the Q column and the notes. I know this is an analysis nightmare but I think I can clean this up if before Julie does her analysis I go through these records [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:44, 11 April 2025 (CDT) }} | {{DT| for this field the default entry for yes is the LTC Medical application, however I later realized that this is not a consult per se, as some have this completed without an actual consult to LTC (the learning process for this project was confusing, I should have spoken to someone from LTC before starting this) I continued to enter it this way, but also answered "yes" for those that had an actual LTC consult where the dttm were either earlier than the medical application or they did not have a medical application but had a LTC consult, I noted details in the Q column and the notes. I know this is an analysis nightmare but I think I can clean this up if before Julie does her analysis I go through these records [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:44, 11 April 2025 (CDT) }} | ||
=== Data | === Data Description === | ||
For every [[LAU LTC consult]] one line with Project = "LTC consult" and item = "not entered" was automatically be entered. That line should have been updated to one of the following: | |||
* '''Project: LTC Consult''' | |||
** Item: "LTC first" | |||
* '''Project: LTC Consult''' | ** Item: "no consult" | ||
* | |||
No cross-checks were implemented so 5 "not entered" records ended up in the data. | |||
==== Sources ==== | ==== Sources ==== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
* consult section | * consult section | ||
* progress notes | * progress notes | ||
== Data Use == | == Data Use == | ||
Revision as of 18:43, 6 May 2025
| Projects | |
| Active?: | legacy |
| Program: | |
| Requestor: | Dr. Dan Roberts |
| Collection start: | 2025-03-15 |
| Collection end: | 2025-04-13 |
This dataset contains data in support of the LAU Collection Project.
Whether a patient needed a consult for Long Term Care (LTC) during their stay. Possible cause of discharge delays.
Data Collection
- For any record collected as part of LAU LTC consult enter:
- The first dttm of consult to LTC
|
for this field the default entry for yes is the LTC Medical application, however I later realized that this is not a consult per se, as some have this completed without an actual consult to LTC (the learning process for this project was confusing, I should have spoken to someone from LTC before starting this) I continued to enter it this way, but also answered "yes" for those that had an actual LTC consult where the dttm were either earlier than the medical application or they did not have a medical application but had a LTC consult, I noted details in the Q column and the notes. I know this is an analysis nightmare but I think I can clean this up if before Julie does her analysis I go through these records Lisa Kaita 07:44, 11 April 2025 (CDT) |
Data Description
For every LAU LTC consult one line with Project = "LTC consult" and item = "not entered" was automatically be entered. That line should have been updated to one of the following:
- Project: LTC Consult
- Item: "LTC first"
- Item: "no consult"
No cross-checks were implemented so 5 "not entered" records ended up in the data.
Sources
- Orders
- consult section
- progress notes
Data Use
This data is being collected as a current state for LAU Collection Project.
Data Integrity Checks (automatic list)
none found
Related articles
| Related articles: |