Query check ACP Status Collection: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Ttenbergen moved page Query check ACP Status Collection for LAU to Query check ACP Status Collection without leaving a redirect: Text replacement - "ACP Status Collection for LAU" to "ACP Status Collection" |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "cross check " to "cross check " |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
* 2025-03-06 - implemented | * 2025-03-06 - implemented | ||
* 2025-03-05 - cross check defined | * 2025-03-05 - [[cross check]] defined | ||
== Related Articles == | == Related Articles == | ||
Revision as of 13:25, 20 June 2025
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | every LAU Collection Project must have an entry, and the date must make sense |
| Related: | Admit date and time, Dispo_DtTm, ACP Status Collection for LAU |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | query check_ACP_Status_Collection_for_LAU |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2025-03-06 |
| Backlogged: | true |
This check is or a temporary entry collected for the LAU Collection Project.
Check:
- Project IN ("ACP first", "ACP last")
- there is at least one entry for every LAU Collection Project record
- "item" is not "not entered"
- (L_TmpV2 table date_var + time_var) must be before Dispo DtTm field
- (L TmpV2 table date_var + time_var) must be after Admit date and time
- only check on RecordStatus ="complete" since a "not entered" record is added automatically for each pt
|
|
Log
- 2025-03-06 - implemented
- 2025-03-05 - cross check defined
Related Articles
| Related articles: |