Query check Project Consults data: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "cross check " to "cross check " |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "[[Category: " to "[[Category:" |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
{{Related Articles}} | {{Related Articles}} | ||
[[Category: LAU Collection Project]] | [[Category:LAU Collection Project]] | ||
[[Category: ACP]] | [[Category:ACP]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:57, 30 July 2025
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | every LAU Collection Project must have an entry, and the date must make sense |
| Related: | Admit date and time, Dispo_DtTm, Project Consults data |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | complete |
| App: | CCMDB.accdb |
| Coding: | query check_Project_Consults_data |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2025-03-06 |
| Backlogged: | true |
This check is or a temporary entry collected for the LAU Collection Project.
Check:
- (L_TmpV2 table date_var, time_var) must not be null
- (L_TmpV2 table date_var + time_var) must be before Dispo DtTm field
- (L TmpV2 table date_var + time_var) must be after Admit date and time
- "item" is not "not entered"
- there is at least one entry for every LAU Collection Project record (Project: Consults)
- only check on RecordStatus="complete" since a "not entered" record is added automatically for each pt
Log
- 2025-03-14-1 - tweak to allow blank date and time when there is no consult
- 2025-03-06 - implemented
- 2025-03-05 - cross check defined
Related Articles
| Related articles: |