Transfer Tracker.mdb: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →bugs |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== bugs == | == bugs == | ||
{{discussion}} | |||
* also there are two files in this list with a site and location. Thought this was part of minimal data set?--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:51, 27 January 2011 (CST) | * also there are two files in this list with a site and location. Thought this was part of minimal data set?--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:51, 27 January 2011 (CST) | ||
** Trish, I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean ''without'' a site and location? I think those were part of an earlier test, they aren't showing up any more now that I have re-imported. | ** Trish, I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean ''without'' a site and location? I think those were part of an earlier test, they aren't showing up any more now that I have re-imported. | ||
== Potential improvements == | == Potential improvements == | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 1 March 2011
Transfer_Tracker.mdb is a repository of all discharges on our ward within the last 2 weeks.
You can find the transfer tracker at
- Regional Server\Output\Transfer_Tracker.mdb
It gets its content from the backup files.
When you open the program, it displays the data that was in the most recent data backup from the last time someone has clicked the "update" button it, and the date of that update in the top left corner.
The program doesn't automatically update because the update can take about 2 minutes. Didn't want to force you to wait when the most recent data might be good enough.
Let me know what you think. Ttenbergen 21:37, 30 December 2010 (CST)
bugs
- also there are two files in this list with a site and location. Thought this was part of minimal data set?--TOstryzniuk 17:51, 27 January 2011 (CST)
- Trish, I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean without a site and location? I think those were part of an earlier test, they aren't showing up any more now that I have re-imported.
Potential improvements
- use self-updating directory listing to import rather than a static list (this doesn't affect functionality while things work, it just makes the program a bit more resilient. Right now there is an error if any site can't be found, and if a new site is added and the hard-code is not amended the site just won't import) Ttenbergen 11:33, 1 March 2011 (CST)