Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions

TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 77: Line 77:
=== QA_Infection ===
=== QA_Infection ===
* see [[QA_Infection#Data Integrity Rules Under Discussion ]]
* see [[QA_Infection#Data Integrity Rules Under Discussion ]]
=== Full Apache Score ===
Add full apache score to the Viewer form
* That one would need thorough testing to make sure I got the score right, e.g. enter 10 patients and check if their apache scores in ccmdb are what you would have calculated. Any volunteers for the testing? If it won't be validated I'd rather not add this to confuse anyone. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:05, 9 June 2010 (CDT)
** Marie Laporte offered to help with this. I will let her know once I have implemented this. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:01, 2 July 2010 (CDT)
{{discussion}}
* What would this "full apache score" be used for? Much of the diagnostic scoring seems to be documented only in the form of a [http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/ccmdb/images/a/ab/ApacheII_MacroDX_code_map.pdf macro] which will be a mess to decipher and implement in Access. What is the benefit? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:48, 29 October 2010 (CDT)
* if this is implemented, Marie Laporte offered to help test this (2010-06-21) [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:43, 27 January 2011 (CST)
**The work involved to design this is of no added benefit to collectors.  We do not need to have Apache point scored at ccmdb level therefore the above change request will not be added.  Thanks for the ideas.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:37, 2012 April 3 (CDT)


=== Help to manage Serial numbers===
=== Help to manage Serial numbers===