No Value: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
Is there anywhere else in [[CCMDB]] that a NO VALUE field is used? This article is not only applicable to pathogens.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:10, 22 September 2010 (CDT) | * Is there anywhere else in [[CCMDB]] that a NO VALUE field is used? This article is not only applicable to pathogens.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:10, 22 September 2010 (CDT) | ||
** What do you mean? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 18:16, 2012 September 6 (CDT) | |||
[[Category: UPL]] | [[Category: UPL]] | ||
[[Category: Non pathogen subcodes]] | [[Category: Non pathogen subcodes]] | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 2012 September 6
An Infection code (31 to 99) without a subcode or a subcode "0" - "No value", is not allowed.
- Use sub code 68-unknown pathogen-culture sent or subcode 92-no culture sent.TOstryzniuk 16:05, 13 June 2011 (CDT)
- Is there anywhere else in CCMDB that a NO VALUE field is used? This article is not only applicable to pathogens.--TOstryzniuk 17:10, 22 September 2010 (CDT)
- What do you mean? Ttenbergen 18:16, 2012 September 6 (CDT)