Notes field
| Data Element (edit) | |
| Field Name: | Notes |
| CCMDB Label: | Notes |
| CCMDB tab: | Top Row |
| Table: | L_Log |
| Data type: | memo |
| Length: | not stated |
| Program: | Med and CC |
| Created/Raw: | Raw |
| Start Date: | 1988-07-11 |
| End Date: | 2300-01-01 |
| Sort Index: | 9 |
Used by data collectors to keep notes during collection and to document outlier values for main office.
The notes field expands to a bigger form when you double-click on it.
Usage of the notes field
The notes field was set up to be a free-for-all where collectors can store any info they want. This resulted in non-standardized collection practices which result in problems during vacation coverage or on shared wards.
Patients being sent
For patients you are ready to send, make sure you note explanations for data values that you think might cause call-backs from the Data Processor or Statistician. For example:
- Extreme data that was confirmed as correct:
- extreme physiological APACHE values, eg Sys BP of 50 valid , see APACHE_Scoring_table and APACHE_physiological_variable_collection#Exceptionally_high_or_low_values
- tasks for renal transplant patients that do not follow the norm
Up-to where/when collection is complete
- where we have left off
- It's interesting that you'd like to know what method I use to keep track of how far I have gotten in a chart when doing reviews, since there has been a bit of controversy just this morning from one of our doc's regarding this very issue. It has been my practice to make a small mark with a yellow highlighter in the margin of the ipn (integrated progress notes) notes, at the last note that I have read. The next time I go back to review the chart, I look for the yellow highlighter mark. I have now had two of our doc's complain about the tiny unobtrusive mark. Any other suggestions that can be used that will keep our doc's happy, would be much appreciated. Thanks. DPageNewton 17:46, 28 September 2010 (CDT)
- Sorry, long delay. Is this still relevant now you have EPR? Ttenbergen 14:24, 2014 September 19 (CDT)
Diagnoses or other data that needs to be reviewed or checked
also to state if the diagnosis is not confirmed yet etc.
- diagnosis is still unclear as they are waiting for further tests or results
- Template:Discussion should such a dx be entered and noted in notes, or not entered until confirmed and tracked in notes instead? Ttenbergen 16:26, 9 November 2010 (CST)
- this is probably a question for main office, especially now that they use the data before completion. Ttenbergen 14:24, 2014 September 19 (CDT)
- Template:Discussion should such a dx be entered and noted in notes, or not entered until confirmed and tracked in notes instead? Ttenbergen 16:26, 9 November 2010 (CST)
Supplemental data
- track all lab and pharmacy manually, the notes save time in that it eliminates the need to go back & recount.
- would you not just enter a new line for these, and the date of the new line would tell you how far you got? Ttenbergen 14:24, 2014 September 19 (CDT)
- to clearly define some admit diagnoses-the ones that come up as other problems, other problems when you enter them.
- only useful if we review it as that at main office. most of the dx use there is by filter, so they would never see this. main office: thoughts? Ttenbergen 14:24, 2014 September 19 (CDT)
- to enter info on base creatinine, bmi, or other tidbits of info that are useful to know.
- useful how? Ttenbergen 14:24, 2014 September 19 (CDT)
- to define what exactly needs to be entered, when a profile is only partially completed.
- Template:Discussion How much of this extra data really makes collection easier? Ttenbergen 16:26, 9 November 2010 (CST)